Posted on 08/22/2021 1:41:11 PM PDT by ransomnote
Someone should let Beau or whatever his name is know. Wait, he ignores facts anyway. It interferes with his propaganda.
bkmk
i just read the FDA the article putatively referenced, and NOTHING in the article is substantiated by the CDC document ... in fact, nearly everything in the article is simply fabricated:
https://fossaorg.files.wordpress.com/2021/08/media.pdf
I’ve excerpted and posted from FDA documents before, CDC documents before - all say no isolated samples were available when PCR was produced.
"Asymptomatic spread" was a necessary fiction to cover over the incredibly high rate of false positives generated by over-cycling the genetic material with the PCR tool.
i just read the FDA the article putatively referenced, and NOTHING in the article is substantiated by the CDC document ... in fact, nearly everything in the article is simply fabricated:
Do you typically struggle with reading comprehenision? If not, then your entire response is fabricated to mislead FReepers, AGAIN.
Page 4 of the linked document, which is the first page with text rather than Table of Contents information, states that the pooled "up to four" nasal swab samples for persons 'suspected of Covid-19. This is trash - it is not isolated viral samples, they have no idea what was in them. They don't know if any of the 'up to four' (they don't even know how many?!) people with seasonal respiractory infections had anything 'new'. We can assume 'influenza' and common cold were present.
You fabricated your accusation that the document doesn't support the article. WHy?
Article Excerpt:
" 
"
I guess the teacher’s union wanted a year off
Just write a protocol deviation.
We don't need no steenkin' GLP.
The PCR saga continues...
LOL..a subtle sharp elbow to the ribs...
They run the PCR tests at 40-49 for the unvaxxed, making 80-90% false positives. So Cases cases cases, mean nothing but blather.
They run the PCR tests at 20-25 where they have a chance of catching a true infection of a virus they cannot prove what it is?
I wonder how many autopsies have been performed to see what people REALLY are dying from?
Nothing there at the link except words saying it was the wrong “African President, and yes one guy died, but it was another African President...blah blah blah
DING DING DING DING DING....winner winner, chicken dinner.
The erasure of Natural Immunity, and the definition of a “Case” used to mean a confirmed sick person, not an asymptomatic who says they lost their smeller.....absurdity I know, but close to it. A fever of 100 and above, losing smell, dry cough..throw in a false test and you get millions of sick people, of what? We are not sure. Plus it is a case if you get a PCR+ test run at 40-49 cycles which find nothing.
Please find a link showing such proof, thank you.
How do they tell the difference between glass lung pneumonia, and common everyday pneumonia? I had never heard about the glass lung variety. Did they make this up?
This is actually old news now. This has been known for 2-3 weeks. It won’t stop freepers like treating it like the real thing though. They still think the test proves that the Texas governor had covid.
Fuzzy, your logic is actually very clear.
https://www.rbf.org/sites/default/files/2019_rbf_990pf.pdf
ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND, INC. 13-1760106 STATEMENT 7A 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 900 FORM 990PF New York, New York 10015 YEAR 2019
Page 55 of 176
12/31/2019 PFIZER INC 53,900.0000 39.180000 1,938,640 2,111,802 12/31/2019 PFIZER INC 5,144.0000 15.847000 66,720 81,517
From https://www.rockefeller.edu/news/30544-vaccines-after-covid-recovery/
Vaccines charge up natural immunity against SARS-CoV-2
May 28, 2021
According to new research, people who have had COVID enjoy strong immunity against the coronavirus for at least a year after they were initially infected. In analyzing antibodies present in the blood of COVID patients, Rockefeller scientists were able to track the evolution of these mutable molecules. They found that vaccination boosts the immunity these individuals naturally develop upon infection, so much that they are likely protected even from the emerging variants.
The 63 people in the study had COVID in the spring of last year. Data from their follow-ups show that, over time, antibodies produced by the immune system’s memory B cells got better and better at neutralizing SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that these people were developing an improved, long lasting defense against the virus.
Moreover, the researchers found that these antibodies were further enhanced among 26 people in the group who had received at least one dose of the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine. This subset of people developed antibodies that are exceptionally resistant to the most concerning SARS-CoV-2 variants, such as those first isolated in the United Kingdom, South Africa, and New York City.
These potent antibodies are produced by groups of highly evolved memory B cells, which expand dramatically after a nudge by the vaccines, the team found.
The findings suggest that well-timed boosters with the current vaccines may provide additional protection in people who have never had the disease.
The study, carried out in the laboratories of Paul Bieniasz and Michel C. Nussenzweig, is available on bioRxiv ahead of publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.