Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Grandpa Drudge

Or these could be records that will allow other states to purge or destroy items. Could be secrets of the fraud busters.


2 posted on 08/21/2021 2:11:04 PM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: George from New England
Dream on, George. Your obfuscation won't work either.
3 posted on 08/21/2021 2:15:14 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my great grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: George from New England; Grandpa Drudge

Yes. I believe you have it.

If Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, others can issue subpoenas as soon as possible, this can notice any would-be evidence destroyers that the election materials are under protective order and any attempt to destroy such materials is a felony.

The Federal statute protecting election materials for 22 months should deter destruction but a legislative subpoena should be stronger and more specific.


38 posted on 08/21/2021 4:01:55 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson