Replies

The current forms of the vaccine, like the vaccines for influenza, do NOT confer 100% immunity. They knew this going in, in that they claimed 90% or maybe 95% efficacy, but never 100%. There may not even be the 90% or 95% efficacy the more optimistic claims asserted.

Not everybody responds with forming the antibodies necessary to resist COVID-19 Wuhan virus infections. But every coronavirus DOES respond to the treatment with zinc ion and an appropriate ionophore like Vitamin D3, hydroxychloroquine, quercetin, or even Vitamin C. The treatment has to be applied early, perhaps as a prophylaxis, and in sufficient quantity to wipe out the developing viral load. The protocol STOPS the coronavirus from replicating, and the natural body defenses restore the damaged tissues.

An active infection can be treated with ivermectin, as well as the hydroxychloroquine-zinc-azithromycin protocol, but it has to be initiated before the deep damage to lung tissues has ensued, or the treatment period will be long extended, and is usually in an intensive care unit. Other much more extreme measures then have to be applied, among them the use of a respirator, which has only a much diminished chance of effecting a cure at that point.

Newer and more exotic treatments for stopping the replication of the COVID-19 Wuhan virus, like remdesivir, are more effective than nothing at all, but be assured that this very expensive drug will be pushed at the expense of the ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine alternatives, as this makes considerably more money for the pharmaceutical companies.