I love people who speak truth to power, but a 45 minute video isn’t going to hold anyone’s attention who is truly looking to have their mind changed. Good information, I’m certain, but 45 minutes is a commitment I’m not willing to take as a normal person.
And the gist is?!?
The feds have no constitutional authority to be meddling in your healthcare. Most of the federal government is unconstitutional, thus, invalid and illegal.
Why should I listen to a huge invalid and illegal entity (the Feds) tell me something about which they have no legitimacy or credibility?
Use your heads people. Start trusting in the Lord and stop trust in man and his lying government.
Watching a 2x speed.
But this should be a 10 minute video at the longest with a written piece to follow up the examples.
Pure Bull$hit.
I think it’s funny that anyone believes she is a nurse.........
Short version?
Why would somebody believe a nurse?
Long video, but her cadence is such that it can be watched on 2x. Makes it about 25 minutes. Still kind of long, but better.
My brother just sent this. It’s a game changer. She even backs up many of her claims with the actual web site data (CDC, etc.)
Excellent video. Understandable and covers a lot of bases.
Bookmark
Doesn’t sound like ivermectin is working as well against the Delta variant. Something for people to keep in mind when considering their options.
“Pierre Kory, MD MPA
@PierreKory
·
Aug 10
To clarify, this is about how important early treatment is in fighting Delta, in vaxxed and unvaxxed. We are finding Delta harder to treat later in the illness’s. We are evaluating changes to our early and late phase protocols to be more effective on Delta.”
@Covid19Critical
Quote Tweet
Pierre Kory, MD MPA
@PierreKory
· Aug 9
I have experienced and am getting reports from FLCCC Alliance members that Delta variant patients crashing into ICU’s… are not showing responses to MATH+. We are demoralized and frightened. Early treatment is CRITICAL. Every household should take I-MASK+ upon first symptoms.”
It is a good video. Twenty minutes in, everything has been well-known by FREEPERS for quite a while, however.
when sloppy joe opened the border, invited, welcomed, and started to spread hundreds of thousands of disease carrying invaders across our country during a so called “global pandemic” proved we were being lied to about the severity of this so called “deadly virus”...
Anyone with a few brain cells knows this entire thing is being used as a political tool. Real medicine is not allowed to upset this big pharma apple cart.
She stressed that employers or governments mandating these covid vaccines, which are still legally experimental with unknown long-term effects, should be illegal under the Nuremberg Code. I suggest saving this to hard drive and/or printing it out in case you need it to deal with an employer or a lawsuit:
The Nuremberg Code (1947) Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996; 313(7070):1445-75.The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
*
