[Robwin]

Truly indicative of Snopes' ethical standards. They really ought apologize for existing.

[Steely Tom]

Isn’t Snopes supposed to be an ethical watchdog or something?

[Captain Peter Blood]

Lapse of judgement is once or twice, 50 times is chronic and intentional.

[dfwgator]

Plagiarism pays. We’ve got a serial plagiarist in the White House.

[qaz123]

Amazing how the when the Left gets caught it was a mistake, minor, an oopsie, my bad, won’t happen again, did I do that, a small oversight.

Never held accountable.

[Billthedrill]

“I had a minor lapse in judgment. 50 times.” Right...

[Impala64ssa]

I’m still waiting for Snopes to debunk the “hands up don’t shoot” narrative. Even Politifact had the intellectual honesty to give it their highest pants on fire rating.

[FrankRizzo890]

Makes me wonder who he crossed that he suddenly became expendable?

[lodi90]

Typical lazy slob “progressive.” Too much work do it him himself.

[DAC21]

What about the lapses in judgement dumping his wife for a hooker/ porn worker only three years or so back? There were other criminal accusations around that same time.

[Tallguy]

Wait, wait. Don’t tell me! “No intent.” Do I win?

[The MAGA-Deplorian]

Once or twice is a serious lapse of judgement. 50 times is a serial issue with your judgement!

[TigersEye]

Taking anything on Snopes seriously is definitely a lapse in judgment.

[cuz1961]

I must be old.

I miss the days when we called that

stealing and lying.

[faucetman]

“sloppy”