Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind
The "Oral Bacteriotherapy" section of the paper provides this information:
The formulation administered in this study contained: Streptococcus thermophilus DSM 32345, L.acidophilus DSM 32241, L. helveticus DSM 32242, L. paracasei DSM 32243, L. plantarum DSM 32244, L. brevis DSM 27961, B. lactis DSM 32246, B. lactis DSM 32247. Ormendes SA, Lausanne, Switzerland which gifted the product Sivomixx® (SivoBiome® in USA) is responsible for the standardization of the product in terms of enzymatic content, biochemical and immunological profile. The oral bacteriotherapy involved the use of 2,400 billion bacteria per day. The formulation was administered in three equal doses per day.
They were not administering 800 billion. Perhaps they diluted it or used a different Sivomixx formulation.
7 posted on 08/14/2021 9:36:11 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Criminal democrats kill babies. Do you think anything else is a problem for them?” ~ joma89)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ProtectOurFreedom

That simply looks like three packets of the probiotic mix.

That’s a lot of gas.


9 posted on 08/14/2021 9:42:50 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Would a common probiotic capsule be considered a form of “oral bacteriotherapy”?


18 posted on 08/14/2021 10:34:18 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson