[Fury]

Right, and Lindell knew that in advance. The man is no fool.

You know that how (that he knew in advance)?

Think about what you are claiming.

You are claiming that Lindell had no intention of paying the $5 million, as he knew IN ADVANCE that the packet captures were not available or were so limited in quantity that a judgement could not be rendered by cyber experts who attended the Symposium.

Think about what your assertion says about Mike Lindell. That he deceived people to attend the Symposium? I don’t believe that was his motive or plan - to have people attend knowing IN ADVANCE that the packet captures were not available. It’s unfortunate that apparently you do.

There’s not much more to write about if you’re suggesting the motives/actions decided in advance by Lindell. As you write, we’ll see how the legal activities go.

Good luck.

[Dr. Franklin]

You are claiming that Lindell had no intention of paying the $5 million, as he knew IN ADVANCE that the packet captures were not available or were so limited in quantity that a judgement could not be rendered by cyber experts who attended the Symposium.

More to the point, Lindell already consulted with 12 cyber security experts, and apparently paid them for their services. They confirmed that the P-caps came from the 2020 election. He really wasn't interested in getting additional opinions. He didn't ask for that. What he offered was a reward to anyone who could prove the data to have been faked. No one their presented any such evidence. If people attending wanted guaranteed access to all of the data, they should have gotten that in writing before attending.