the article headline certainly implies it’s a “child” not a teen. and there is a difference.
“the article headline certainly implies it’s a “child” not a teen. and there is a difference.”
I looked online at a number of articles and never could find an age. So if it is under the age of 18, which renders the responsibility to the child by law in some states, the arrest said nothing and it could be under that which the law in a number of states erases the responsibility of the man doing the tattoo. I guess it rally comes down to the agenda of the writers or the lawmakers. Under 18 can have an abortion by their youthful capacity, but not a tattoo? Me thinks their values are a bit misconstrued.
wy69