I think what you understand is wishful but I”m not a lawyer and that really does not matter because resolution would require a legal argument. Even the lawyers do not know the outcome of that.
We live in a legalistic but lawless society in my opinion. Intent and spirit are just ignored when they are inconvenient. The attitude is that may not be legal but prove me wrong. Burden of proof is on the accuser of course and the inability to win the argument of proof is what the lawless bank on. Right and wrong don’t make a damn bit of difference what the lawless can get away with is all that matters. Right and wrong only matter if both parties have self-imposed moral / ethical limitations. Outside of that, let the games begin.
The law only forms the framework for litigation and the ensuing argument determines the applicability and violation of the law. Just as in contracts, if either party does not abide by the contract in the opinion of the other party culpability is determined by the court. Bottom line of this is to avoid entering into contracts with a belligerent if at all possible.
Furthermore, the giverment is in on this up to their pointy head. They want the FDA approval, they want everyone to be vaccinated regardless of efficacy or even morality. That could not be more clear to me. They make the laws and the law is not a problem for them. They will continue to make the laws and control us until we stop them.
If FDA rubber stamp approves any of these vaccines every “legal” and ethical argument including Nuremberg and Hippocratic Oath are not worth much more than the paper they are written on. Moral arguments do not matter to the court or the giverment or the employer. After that approval by FDA it seems the burden of proof becomes intentional and knowing endangerment. I doubt seriously you could win that one if the defendant has the official FDA okey dokey in hand. Of course the giverment knows this and that is why they are hell bent for leather to clear the decks of resistance with FDA approval.
The only thing I see that can stop enforced vaccinations is public outcry and the politicians getting nervous about their phoney baloney jobs to raise red flags of threats against it or refusal damn the consequences. If politicians allow this to go forward, just like the nazis, the only way to beat them is to win the war against them by force if necessary.
>>>If FDA rubber stamp approves any of these vaccines every “legal” and ethical argument including Nuremberg and Hippocratic Oath are not worth much more than the paper they are written on.<<<
The Nazi medical experimenters thought they had immunity, too. 1. “Just following orders” 2. No laws in total war.
They were hanged. Just saying.
It all depends on the as-yet unknown long-term side effects of coercing millions of people into taking an experimental synthetic mRNA jab.
If it’s on the level of Thalidomide, many CEOs will be hanged.
Do I know it will be on the Thalidomide level? NO. Do the Pfizer and Moderna executives know? NO THEY DO NOT.
They are willing to gamble that risk to millions of people tomorrow, for billions in profits to themselves today.
No Year 2020 (bribed, bought) promises of immunity will hold up to the images below in the minds of millions, if there are terrible unknown side effects.
The CEOs were willing to gamble. The downside risk is hanging. Ask the Nazis how that went.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=thalidomide+babies&t=chromentp&atb=v134-1&iax=images&ia=images