From the article:
“ Again, this is a theoretical exercise I am presenting for consideration. I am not making the claim that an mRNA vaccine will permanently alter your genomic DNA, and I didn’t make this claim in my first article, although it appears that troll sites made the fallacious claim that I did. I simply asked the question, and provided hypothetical, plausible molecular pathways by which such an event could occur. ”
So, the title of the article contradicts his position.
No it doesn’t, he states clearly (in both articles) that this is his theory not a fact, and in the second article presents a study that lends credence to the theory.
He uses the word “suggests”, as in it is possible or plausible.
The only way we could know this “for a fact” is to do autopsies on covid deaths, but it seems, after a year and a half, there seems to be no real urgency to finding out what covid (or the vaccine) are doing to the human body. I guess there’s no money in that when you can make millions off a “vax”
“ So, the title of the article contradicts his position.”
——————————————————————————————
It usually does.
Almost as if the writer is counting on their followers to be to lazy or dumb to read the actual article and instead explode with their emotional response from the title.
As we see happening once again………
It’s really an insult to their fans.