Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This is a long read--if you do not have scientific training it may be a bit thick reading. The takeaway is our current vaccines are new and not extremely effective at preventing development of Covid-19. Therefore, if roughly one out of ten vaccinated get the disease then the virus has an opportunity to mutate and evade the immune system.

This is a bit out of my area of expertise, so if you are an immunologist, virologist or physician feel free to explain the subject better.

1 posted on 08/10/2021 7:57:10 PM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: packagingguy

Viri are gonna mutate. Regardless.

It’s what they do.


2 posted on 08/10/2021 8:31:59 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: packagingguy

It’d be nice if someone could get this to Dr Stock, in Indiana, and have him weigh in like he did at that board meeting.


3 posted on 08/10/2021 8:34:22 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

“imperfect vax”

“snafu vax”

“glitch vax”

“almost vax”


5 posted on 08/10/2021 8:43:07 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: packagingguy

We will never know how much damage the Wuhan virus has done in terms of a real death count. After inflating the number of deaths from the disease, now they’re hiding how many the vaccine has killed. Give up on ever getting the truth.


6 posted on 08/10/2021 8:52:10 PM PDT by Spok (Those who can compel you to believe absurdities can compel you to commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: packagingguy

This article does not address Covid specifically but has a more disturbing takeaway than the one you mentioned. It notes that viruses that quickly kill off their hosts are generally less successful, but a vaccine that improves host survival without much reducing host infectiousness would tend to remove that disadvantage. It would allow rare or newly evolved deadly strains to become more dominant. It gives the example of Marek’s disease virus in chickens.


8 posted on 08/10/2021 8:56:06 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: packagingguy

“This is an article from 2015 about disease evolution being driven by vaccines that are not highly effective.”

Thanks.

“This may explain the origin of the different variants of SARS-CoV-2 we have seen since the beginning of vaccination.”

These “variants” arose well before the vaccines were being given and in countries that weren’t being vaccinated..


9 posted on 08/10/2021 9:09:03 PM PDT by ifinnegan ( Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: packagingguy

I have been telling people this for a long time.

if anyone wants an easy read, just look up mareks disease in chicken

soon you will understand why semi-effective Leaky vaccines are a wet-dream for pharmaceutical companies.


10 posted on 08/10/2021 9:20:59 PM PDT by algore ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: packagingguy

In this study there were existing viral strains that varied in pathogenicity. One they used was 100% deadly.

It’s known that a very deadly virus is unable to be transmitted as well as less pathogenic strains, mainly because the deadly-strain infected chickens die before they can spread it to many others.

But if a vaccine reduces the pathogenicity, the virus can be spread despite being deadly because the vaccinated don’t die.

Covid virus is not pathogenic enough for this selection dynamic to come in to play. There’s not a near 100% deadly fast acting strain. In fact quite the opposite where the feast majority gave no symptoms.

If there were a highly deadly Covid virus strain it could be selected for, in theory, in vaccinated populations. But if so the response would be to vaccinate all chickens/everyone and/or increase strict quarantine.


12 posted on 08/10/2021 9:27:31 PM PDT by ifinnegan ( Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: packagingguy

Correct.

It’s like taking your antibiotics for 2 days instead of the prescribed 7.

And doing it again...100 million times.


13 posted on 08/10/2021 9:31:33 PM PDT by Mariner (War criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson