As was stated during the symposium, words to this effect . . . we need to wake up the state assemblies to do their jobs and it seems the only way to effectively do this is through the court of public opinion.
Of course, Mr. Lindell and company can do nothing to enforce election law, but they can still present the evidence which seems to be airtight and irrefutable. Americans are calling on their legislators to look into this - and little by little, they are.
Its sad that it has to be done this way - but the interesting thing is that no one is speaking in opposition to them, only trying to silence them - by any trick their wicked minds might devise. It has not come to bloodshed, and hopefully, it won’t. At least not that we are aware of.
My charitable interpretation is that both sides (pro- & con-Lindell) are right.
Yes, Lindell is talking way too much. He needs to use the three days to provide hard evidence of Chinese vote hacking & fraud. Not "bounce the rubble" and repeat points he's made for months. I think the latter half of the first day was chaotic and wasted -- Bannon and the other guests looked like deer-in-the-headlights while Mike rattled on. Yes Mike funded this, but he needed to get to the evidence. People on stage seemed afraid to interrupt since Mike's paid for it.
Yes, new hard evidence of a Steal should be coming tomorrow. I am not an expert in election technology, but demonstrations that Dominion machines can be hacked during the Symposium, and then showing evidence (emails, sworn affidavits, packet captures) of deliberate vote count manipulation would be damning.
Unfortunately, the Symposium stream was being hacked and the planned agenda destroyed all day long - with a guest apparently bailing (threats or intimidation?), etc. I saw people on stage intently staring at their phones; and Lindell getting handed paper notes with information during the broadcast. It is possible Lindell was changing the program he'd planned in real time, as we watched yesterday - causing him to "fill" some air time with extended rants and audience questions while he and his team were modifying the day's schedule. There was also clearly a lot of churning (political arm twisting) starting at state Elections / SOS offices.
I felt bad that Lindell repeated talking points we've heard often, but he probably felt a quick rehash was perhaps needed because new viewers would appreciate the "background" information prior to the evidence being rolled out.
These are just my general impressions, hopefully the rest of the symposium will be more productive.
It puzzles me that Freepers are suddenly at each others' throats. Some of the drama may be FBI-pers posing as FReepers. I discounted it heavily -- as guys just blowing off steam (heh heh). I think we need to wait and see what happens.