Posted on 08/08/2021 10:49:15 AM PDT by HypatiaTaught
According to VAERS, we roughly have 12,000 dead of the jab...
Probably a good baseline number since reporting false info is criminal. The real number is probably higher since I have read many “anecdotal” accounts from MD’s who cannot access the system due to high volume? Shutdowns?
However this number is only 1% to 10% of actual dead from the Jab....
An estimate based on the Harvard and other studies. I don’t think this range is very reliable today, as I understand the worst year for vaccine deaths in the past was about 50. Thus, that range was based on much smaller numbers than we see today.
Let’s say it is 10%. The math then shows at least 120,000 folks died from the jab....
Maybe, but there’s is a difference between math calculation and mathematical certainty.
VAERS represents a working number, a backlog of cases to be investigated and verified. I’m not a CDC HR type but I doubt these vaccine deaths will ever be investigated because who’s going to do them? Aside from the politics, the CDC is probably staffed to investigate 50-100 cases in a bad year. Today they are overwhelmed and understaffed. Thus, I doubt we will ever know the true number but the current number posted is probably a good working baseline.
Those who dismiss the current VAERS data as “unverified” are deliberately deceptive. They can close their eyes but the bottom line is that far more people are dead or injured from these atypical vaccines than any seen in the past. All for a disease with a less than 1% fatality rate.
enough. i’ve said my peace. hopefully others here have heard.
So I questioned your authority and now you pout. Hopefully others heard. Cause now they know what I know, and so do you: you’re wrong. Buh bye
hopefully others here have heard....
I have. You made good points which your critics failed to invalidate.
>>However this number is only 1% to 10% of actual dead from the Jab....
Yea that makes perfect sense, maybe an extra hundred thousand vaccine related deaths, that nobody bothered to report to VAERS.
thx bro or sis. i watch and learn many of these threads too.
>>In other words, you are too much of a Chicken to admit you have nothing.
Only thing I am afraid of is getting into a long, drawn out debate with a moron, so yes, I am afraid of wasting my time.
Really?
I suspect Mandarin. It may well align with his sympathies.
The Vax Priests are a cultish bunch. Haunched down and displaying their asses like good cuck targets. Certainly, plenty of them are RINOs.
No one is ruining FR.
You didn’t question his authority. You simply accused him of being a liar. He’s far more correct than you could ever be. deal with your butthurt.
I DID question his authority.
I did NOT accuse him of lying.
And if you think those things happened then you don’t actually understand anything you read and I fully understand why you think he’s right. I got no butthurt. And again, if you think I do you lack basic reading comprehension.
Spin it all you want. Makes no difference.
Could very well be the case. However, I have much doubt that we will ever see any truthful numbers about anything related to this scam.
And your lack of attempt at proof shows the truth again. It’s always the guys with the wild accusations and no proof that insist they’re right. Meanwhile, back in reality, you’re wrong. And we both know it. Cause if you had ANYTHING you’d use it.
Agreed.
Well, not if you're being intellectually honest.
I wasn't citing VAERS.
The politicization of the CDC has been ongoing for decades.
It is obvious, the various federal agencies have always been political creatures, although they are supposed to "follow the science".
What we have seen as the Internet made discovery of facts easier, and exposure of fraud in the agencies easier, is we have been deceived for decades by administrators with political motives.
Moreover, it is in the interest of many of our ruling class to promote division in the United States, as they have their primary loyalty elsewhere, either to a global elite, Chinese cash, or anthropogenic warming fantasy.
>>However this number is only 1% to 10% of actual dead from the Jab....
Yea that makes perfect sense, maybe an extra hundred thousand vaccine related deaths, that nobody bothered to report to VAERS.
//////////
Did you read my comment regarding that point? Here it is for you.
//////////
However this number is only 1% to 10% of actual dead from the Jab....
An estimate based on the Harvard and other studies. I don’t think this range is very reliable today, as I understand the worst year for vaccine deaths in the past was about 50. Thus, that range was based on much smaller numbers than we see today.
Let’s say it is 10%. The math then shows at least 120,000 folks died from the jab....
Maybe, but there’s is a difference between math calculation and mathematical certainty.
/////////////
Please know what you’re talking about before bothering me with a stupid, sarcastic reply.
Do you have a source for your first sentence?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.