what would be an example of a “false” declaration about this vaccine? there is plenty of data now indicating that this vaccine is neither effective against getting the virus, transmitting the virus, completely safe by previous standards (i.e., vars reports etc), well tested by previous standards, durable, non-emergency approved by the cdc, and was developed and/or tested using aborted fetal cell lines.
so what possible declaration could you for instance make against this vaccine that would be false? just curious.
And that evidence is accelerating in the last few weeks/month...
When looking at stories, or data, keep in mind the timeframe. Is the data they are sharing/reporting regarding the entire vaccination timeline (from Jan), when there were far fewer variants and far fewer participating in the experimental injections? Or, is it what's happening recently, in the last week or last month with a growing pool of variants and participents in the experiments? The following are about the current surge.
He’s asking about a RELIGIOUS exemption. The examples you cite would likely be denied. Now, if your church came out with an edict saying vaccination was a sin, you could certainly present that to the employer and they could consider it valid. Claiming you belong to a religion or church (or cult) that you don’t actually belong to would obviously be a false declaration.
Now, if he thinks saying he can’t get the vax because it was tested on cells developed from the HEK293 line, it’s worth a shot, and better than making something up. But I think the odds are slim. Throwing in arguments about safety and efficacy would almost certainly hurt his case.
Personally, I don’t think anyone should have to be vaccinated. But apparently his employer does.