Replies

That is all true, but there is a difference between the Bush attitude and rational and the intentions behind the current one. We now see that Bush’s major flaw was that he was blind to the long term consequences of his policies. He viewed his role as that of an executive steering a large corporation, serving up decisions based on the prevailing wishes of his constituency. He had no long term vision for the country.;for example he established the current police state based on what he thought was the countriy’s overwhelming and immediate desire for safety.. No sunset provisions to dismantle the apparatus once he left office were in place. Obama!s minions inherited the scaffolding for there police apparatus when he left office.

Also recall that NAFTA had not completely failed at that point, and there was widespread concern among our intelligentsia that our population would not provide enough labor to compete in the world wide markets.

If it sounds like I’m defending W here, I assure you I’m not, he was disastrous to the countries future. However it has to be said that his motives were essentially liberal— in the classical liberal sense—and fundamentally different from those steering the present chaos.

Bush and the others were, and still are in some cases, duped. Now that the stooges have fallen away we see that the power behind this is unified in its malevolent intents world wide totalitarian order. It has embraced Marxism as a strategy, understanding that Marxist Revolution will create the chaos they plan to exploit to establish their power.

The thing that gets me is how blind I was to all the indications, all the elements of the scheme lay right under my nose: the flagrant propagandizing by the media, the complete occupation of the schools, the sabotage of standards of morality, and so on, all of these indicate a monolithic force behind it. It is all laid out before us in broad daylight, and the principle behind it all is simple— Marxism.