Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

X-59 Resembles Actual Aircraft
NASA ^ | Aug 3, 2021 | Sasha Ellis

Posted on 08/03/2021 5:02:03 PM PDT by BenLurkin

A heavy chorus of bolting and machinery filled the X-59 Quiet SuperSonic Technology, or QueSST, assembly building as engineers, system technicians, and aircraft fabricators worked to merge the major aircraft sections together, making it look like an actual aircraft for the first time since the initial cut of metal in 2018.

"We’ve now transitioned from being a bunch of separate parts sitting around on different parts of the production floor to an airplane,” said Jay Brandon, NASA chief engineer for the Low Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD) project.

NASA’s X-59 QueSST is under construction at Lockheed Martin Skunk Works in Palmdale, California, and is designed to fly at supersonic speeds – approximately 660 mph at sea level - without producing a startling sonic boom for people on the ground.

NASA will work with U.S. communities to understand their response to the aircraft’s sound and provide that data to regulators, which could change the rules that currently ban supersonic flight over land, cutting travel time in half for air travelers in the near future.

The Merger

With great precision and accuracy, the team used features on the structure to precisely self-locate the aircraft’s wing, tail assembly, and fuselage or forward section, then employed a series of laser projections to verify the precise fit.

“The extensive use of features and pre-drilled, full-size fastener holes has significantly reduced the time it takes to locate and fit parts, especially mating large assemblies like this,” said David Richardson, Lockheed Martin program director. “It is sort of like how Legos go together. We used the laser tracker to make sure it is all aligned per the engineering specs before we permanently bolted it all together.”

The mating of these major hardware components was a breath of fresh air for the team.

“A milestone like this - seeing the airplane coming together as a single unit - really reinvigorates and motivates the team,” said Dave Richwine, NASA’s LBFD deputy project manager for technology.

Fuselage

The aircraft’s fuselage contains the cockpit and helps define the shape of the X-59. Eventually the 30-foot-long nose of the aircraft will be mounted to the fuselage.

Part of the cockpit is something you might see in an office. The pilot will see the sky ahead through a 4K computer monitor, which will display complex computer-processed imagery from two cameras mounted above and below the X-59’s nose. NASA calls this forward-facing “window” the eXternal Vision System or XVS.

The XVS serves as an additional safety aid to help the pilot maneuver safely through the skies. This cutting-edge vision system is necessary because the desired shape and long nose of the X-59 won’t allow for a protruding cockpit canopy.

The X-59’s unique shape controls the way the air moves away from the plane, ultimately preventing a sonic boom from disturbing communities on the ground.

Wing

The most recognizable part of the airplane – the wing – was “the most complicated section and first section of the X-59 that was fabricated by Lockheed Martin,” explained Richwine. Housed within the 29.5-foot-wide wing are the aircraft’s fuel systems and a large portion of its control systems.

The Lockheed Martin team used robotic machines with names that sound like pilot call signs – Mongoose and COBRA – to manufacture the wing before its mate to the tail assembly and fuselage.

Mongoose is a tool with the ability to weave together composite wing skins using ultraviolet light to bind the composite material. COBRA - Combined Operation: Bolting and Robotic AutoDrill – efficiently created holes that allowed the team to attach the wing skins to the wing frame.

Tail Assembly

The tail assembly contains the engine compartment. This section is built with heat resistant materials that protect the aircraft from the heat given off by the X-59's GE F414 engine.

The engine is in the upper section of the X-59. Similar to the XVS, it is one of many purposeful design elements that ensure the aircraft is shaped as desired to produce a quieter noise to people below.

What’s the point of the X-59 – apart from it just being ‘plane’ cool?

The X-59 – the visual centerpiece of the mission - definitely brings in the cool factor, but the data part of NASA’s mission - the nerdy part – is what will revolutionize speedy commercial air travel over land.

NASA’s quiet supersonic mission involves building the X-59 (happening now) and conducting initial flight tests starting in 2022.

In 2023, NASA will fly the X-59 over the test range at the agency’s Armstrong Flight Research Center in California to prove it can produce a quieter sonic thump and is safe to operate in the National Airspace System. More than 175 ground recording systems will measure the sound coming from the X-59.

In 2024, NASA will fly the X-59 over several communities around the nation to gauge people’s response to the sonic thump sound produced by the aircraft – if they hear anything at all. The data collected will be given to the Federal Aviation Administration and the International Civil Aviation Organization for their consideration in changing the existing bans on supersonic flight over land.

That ban went into effect in 1973 and has plagued commercial supersonic ventures ever since, restricting faster-than-sound travel only to flights over the ocean. British Airways and Air France flying the Concorde were two airlines that offered such service between 1976 and 2003.

If rules change because of NASA’s data, a new fleet of commercial supersonic aircraft become viable, allowing passengers to hop on a plane and arrive from distant destinations in half the time. Though the single-piloted X-59 will never carry passengers, aircraft manufacturers may choose to incorporate its technology into their own designs.

The Future Awaits

With an eye to the future, the team is rigorously working on final assembly of the X-59, which will mark the end of manufacturing.

In late 2021, Lockheed Martin will ship the X-59 to a sister facility in Ft. Worth, Texas, where ground testing will be done to ensure the aircraft can withstand the loads and stresses that typically occur during flight. There, the team also will calibrate and test the fuel systems before the X-59 makes the journey back to California for more tests.

Though seemingly a long way away, community overflights, data collection and a possible new commercial market for supersonic flight over land is just around the corner.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: nasa; supersonic; x59
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

The team at Lockheed Martin Skunk Works in Palmdale, California, merged the major sections of the X-59 Quiet SuperSonic Technology aircraft, which includes the wing, tail assembly, and fuselage or forward section. This marks the first time the X-59 resembles an actual aircraft.
Credits: Lockheed Martin

1 posted on 08/03/2021 5:02:03 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I wonder how many Chinese engineers Lockheed Martin has assigned to the project.


2 posted on 08/03/2021 5:13:12 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I wonder how many Chinese engineers Lockheed Martin has assigned to the project.


3 posted on 08/03/2021 5:13:48 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

All they need is 1.


4 posted on 08/03/2021 5:31:05 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The stoMr. Penkevichne age didn't end because we ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
All they need is 1.

The vehicle looks too small to be able to do anything practical with it.

5 posted on 08/03/2021 5:41:21 PM PDT by plsvn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: plsvn

Do you understand the concept of “experimental”? That’s what the “X” stands for.


6 posted on 08/03/2021 5:49:22 PM PDT by Chainmail (Frater magnus te spectat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Eventually the 30-foot-long nose of the aircraft will be mounted to the fuselage”

Any guesses how an air crew is going to be able to safely taxi, take off & land a plane where the cockpit sits 30-ft behind the nose? Oh wait? The engineers are the experts and like the CDC us peons aren’t supposed to use our common sense evaluating the situation.


7 posted on 08/03/2021 5:52:38 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

... I mean when the electronics fail.


8 posted on 08/03/2021 5:54:21 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Artist rendition of the completed aircraft. That is one crazy setup for the cockpit. Basically no forward windows due to, I suppose, an attempt to reduce the fuselage cross-section. Probably uses a display screen for the pilot so he can "see" forward.

9 posted on 08/03/2021 5:57:05 PM PDT by Flick Lives (We may or may not have reached herd immunity, but we've definitely achieved herd stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Is that a sun roof, moon roof, half-roof, or no roof at all?


10 posted on 08/03/2021 6:01:13 PM PDT by nicollo (I said no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Ummm, probably cameras feeding into the cockpit.


11 posted on 08/03/2021 6:01:41 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

... I mean when the electronics fail.

Most high performance aircraft are fly-by-wire and they don’t work if the electronics fails, but these types of aircraft have layers of backup systems.

With some of the more exotic aircraft, like the F-117 Nighthawk, the plane is so inherently *unstable* that even if manual controls existed, it would be impossible to fly manual-only.


12 posted on 08/03/2021 6:04:51 PM PDT by Flick Lives (We may or may not have reached herd immunity, but we've definitely achieved herd stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Reminds me of the 50’s Douglas X3


13 posted on 08/03/2021 6:08:51 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Tophat9000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nicollo
Is that a sun roof, moon roof, half-roof, or no roof at all?

You almost have to figure the next step in an aircraft design is to not even bother with windows. The pilot would just have view screens that look like he's looking outside. Or take it even one more step and the pilot just wears a pair of VR goggles.


14 posted on 08/03/2021 6:12:05 PM PDT by Flick Lives (We may or may not have reached herd immunity, but we've definitely achieved herd stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Perhaps. But we’re not talking about military aircraft here operating from relatively remote air bases. These are commercial aircraft operating from urban airports. These aircraft must, in my view, be inherently stable and be able to operate in degraded conditions with steam gouges and mark-one eyeball.


15 posted on 08/03/2021 6:12:17 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

These are flying Teslas designed to get John Kerry & AL Gore to Davos each year so they can lecture us about carbon offsets. These planes will not be any more economically viable than Concord was. They haul fewer passengers and all the concepts for production models are this small.


16 posted on 08/03/2021 6:16:09 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Any guesses how an air crew is going to be able to safely taxi, take off & land a plane where the cockpit sits 30-ft behind the nose? >>>> Mount a go pro on the front?


17 posted on 08/03/2021 6:23:26 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Not actually an aeronautical engineer, are you


18 posted on 08/03/2021 6:31:54 PM PDT by Chainmail (Frater magnus te spectat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
"I wonder how many Chinese engineers Lockheed Martin has assigned to the project."

Better yet, wonder how many American citizens have been assigned to the project...

Of course we can be assured that LGBT and people-of-color each have their fair proportion represented...

All they are doing is applying tried & true American science & engineering know-how that proved so succesful 70-years ago.../s

19 posted on 08/03/2021 6:34:39 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Maybe the aircraft is ultimately going to be unmanned.


20 posted on 08/03/2021 6:38:53 PM PDT by Ben Dover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson