Posted on 08/03/2021 11:16:59 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
Trump’s problem is that he didn’t have much to choose from.
Why would successful people give up their careers to take all those arrows?
Very true. Even he didn’t have to do it. I just can’t figure out why he won’t get verbal about mandatory vaxes, vax passports and about those people still held in the DC gulag from Jan 6th.
Bothers me and I am not alone in that.
I had covid in early 2020. After a few days when I realized what it was, shut it right down by inhaling ozone,(No kids... don’t try this at home unless you know what you’re doing), along with massive doses of D + C.
Doesn't the average tin-pot dictator get at least 99% of the vote?
They must share factual, scientifically grounded, and consensus-driven information for the betterment of public health. Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibil...
Meanwhile, guess who gets a Get-Out-Of-Jail free card regarding CoupFlu liability...
So why wasn’t Big Med agitating for immunity protection..?
Or, if they were, why didn’t get the same protection our so-called public health servants have been afforded?
Inquiring minds want to know
The more I look at how all of this took place, the more I am convinced that Trump was part of the plan. He served as the shiny object we all focused on as our nation was being stolen from us. He did NOTHING as President to address the stolen election. NOTHING. He spent those last two months acting as though our President is constrained by the other two branches of government when handling issues of national security when he was, in fact, a branch onto himself and THE branch in charge of national security. Trump was and still is one of "them".
But, But, But...Trust the Science!
/eyeroll
Wow, between this and the woke AMA & med schools, what’s next, re-education camps for doctors?
One only see’s this in authoratarian regimes. Stop any “critical / open minded thinking” as it goes against the narrative.
It falls under the category of not questioning any Fake News or Propoganda.
We all know that fake news is the mingling lies, facts, and opinions.
A common definition of propaganda is that it “seeks to induce action, adherence and participation — with as little thought as possible”.
Common propaganda ploys related to medicine include the following:
• Hiding limitations of research.
• Preparing uncritical, incomplete research reviews related to a practice or policy.
• Ignoring counterevidence to favored views.
• Ignoring or misrepresenting well-argued alternative views and related evidence.
• Arguing ad hominem (attacking the critic) rather than adrem (responding to the argument).(Quackary - Propaganda in the Helping Professions. 2012. Eileen Gambrill. Oxford University Press)
“If you control the language, you control the argument
If you control the argument, you control information,
If you control information, you control history,
If you control history, you control the past.
He who controls the past controls the future.”
— Big Brother, “1984” (George Orwell)
Indicators of Propaganda
• Discouraging critical appraisal of claims; avoiding opportunities to discuss views with others who favor alternative views.
• Infl ated claims (puff ery); excessive claims of certainty (We have “the way”).
• Personal attacks/ridicule.
• Presentation of information/issues/views out of context; hiding context.
• Vagueness that obscures interests and arguments.
• Emotional appeals.
• Suppression of data unfavorable to views promoted.
• Distortion and suppression of competing well-argued views.
• Appeal to popular prejudices.
• Reliance on informal fallacies, such as unfounded authority and manner of presentation to support claims.
• Appeals to case examples and testimonials to support claims of eff ectiveness.
• Reliance on association and suggestion (e.g., negative innuendo).
• Transforming words to suit aims.
• Claiming one thing but doing another.
• Repetition.
• Oversimplification of complex topics.
The big problem with this, Jay W, is that “misinformation” is in the eye of the beholder, and yesterday’s COVID “misinformation” is today’s standard information.
I’m not talking about microchips, or poison in the shots. I have a feeling that THEY are talking about riffs on “the emperor has no clothes”, and I have certainly been posting plenty of THAT.
They are going to leave the crackpots alone. They are going to go after people who have been vocal about airborne transmission, early treatment, and non-natural evolution, all of which are well within the bounds of conventional medicine.
I never knew ,,,, that's a whole lot of compare/contrast.
Thank you
Censorship destroys trust.
Yep!
” scientifically grounded, and consensus-driven information for the betterment of public health.”
consensus driven information-now doctors vote on stuff? do they use dominion machines? mail in ballots?
just when you think they can’t get any stupider they take it as a challenge and show you they can.
This is getting right to the Chinese social-credit system. Do what they do not like, and they will penalize you.
Science is illegal in the USA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.