The headline is grammatically flawless - if rather top-heavy. My only criticism would be the "into appearing to accept." My understanding is that he did, in fact, accept the bogus money.
I applaud the fact that it conveys the essence of the matter in relatively few words, that it doesn't "beat around the bush," but rather addresses the core controversy directly.
Regards,
YouTube pranksters dupe anti-vaxxer, Piers Corbyn, into...Contradictory clauses can be grammatically sound?
He was duped, but appears to accept?Regardless, appreciate the reply.
Can’t be. It’s those who support the use of the vaccine in some populations that are bought and paid for not those who oppose the vaccine. I’ve been told that many times. Oops!