Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo

A little update on thorium-fueled molten-salt reactors.

A thorium-fueled molten salt reactor is inherently much safer, and also cheaper to set up and run. The fuel, thorium, is both more plentiful and much safer to handle than uranium, and it is not capable of runaway “China syndrome” overheating and meltdown. And one of the more important advantages, it NEEDS a small amount of a “spent” uranium fuel rod to initiate and sustain a nuclear reaction in the molten salt solution, so eventually the stockpiles of “spent” uranium fuel rods will be used up. There is a small amount of atomic “ash” left over when thorium reactors are recharged, but its volume is both much smaller, and composed of relatively short-lived atomic isotopes, in contrast to the uranium fuel rods.


56 posted on 07/28/2021 3:32:26 PM PDT by alloysteel ( Cows don't give milk. You have to work for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: alloysteel

Cool. 😎


57 posted on 07/28/2021 3:50:27 PM PDT by Kevmo (Right now there are 500 political prisoners in Washington, DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson