I pay absolutely no heed to “Juan O Savin”. Ransomnote did dig on him. He has no more insider info than anyone else.
When I dug on Bianca, found she was mostly on FB which as not a member I could not access that well.
She makes many, many claims and I would like evidence, on either side of the issue. She is appearing at an event soon with Gen. Flynn, maybe she’ll give details. Nice to have something to read, with proof of her claims.
I know Allen West is running against Abbot; whatever Abbot’s weaknesses and strengths, I am sure Gov. West will be better.
I think Juan O’Savin is a “fabulist” and a story teller
who loves the sounds in his head and that of his own voice.
We can complain about that, or we can listen up and “Expand our thinking”.
I believe he obviously knows MIL strategy and expounds on it. Like Steve Bannon.
Juan, however, simply claims more insider status. A LOT, actually.
You and I don’t have to know if that is true or was ever true.
Juan will be a part of Mike Lindell’s coming presentation, on Day 3, in some manner.
He adds to understanding and takes away absolutely nothing from the Q argument.
Putting down odd sources because we’re unfamiliar and outside their orbit is a closed minded mistake.
Disinformation is necessary.
Code-speak is necessary.
These guys are not doing Girl-think, or drawing pictures, or handing out their classified Resume for us to pick at.
Juan has respectable platforms. Having friends, and who your friends are, says plenty. Somebody is using him as a platform.
Nobody is dismissing him.
Style points and proofs, at this point, really do not matter. We are not informed and we can’t evaluate proofs at this time anyway and we’re not going to be. Too much is at stake for quibbles.
Details and proofs for you are details for the enemy.
Let’s wait and see.