Q CONTENT- Speculative theory: possible introduction of graphene/graphene oxide in drinking water and household materials
rn: When Q said, “watch the water,” what if they meant, “watch out for graphene in the drinking water?
Graphene Toxicity - The Interview - The Graphene Council
Excerpts of (2011?) interview with Dr. Andrew Maynard:
SNIP
(Journalist) "This important distinction between the toxicity and risk of freeborn nanomaterials versus their risks after they have been incorporated into another material has remained oddly absent from both the mainstream media and to an extent the research community, and most definitely from the non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who want to ban all nanotechnology research."
SNIP
(Journalist) "Last year, researchers at Brown University reported in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that indicated that edges of graphene platelets were capable of cutting, or piercing, human lung tissue. In the research, the Brown team placed the graphene next to lung, skin and immune cells in a petri dish."
SNIP
"....one of the researchers even went so far as to say in a press release from the university that “These materials can be inhaled unintentionally, or they may be intentionally injected or implanted as components of new biomedical technologies.” What do you suppose he imagined would be the scenario in which we unintentionally inhaled graphene? Could this happen outside of a manufacturing facility in which graphene was used to make a product?"
[ransomnote: I pray that nebulizers, inhalers, ventilators are safe]
SNIP
[*rn: The original article,“Graphene Not All Good”, is gone from university website and gone from 2021 pages in the Wayback archive. I replaced the dead link with an old link from WaybackMachine (2014) and put a complete copy in Festival.
http://web.archive.org/web/20140513094745/http://ucrtoday.ucr.edu/22044
Graphene Not All Good
Material that could change electronics industry is shown to be very mobile in water and likely to cause negative environmental impacts if spilled
RIVERSIDE, Calif. (www.ucr.edu) — In a first-of-its-kind study of how a material some think could transform the electronics industry moves in water, researchers at the University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering found graphene oxide nanoparticles are very mobile in lakes or streams and therefore likely to cause negative environmental impacts if released.
Graphene oxide nanoparticles are an oxidized form of graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms prized for its strength, conductivity and flexibility. Applications for graphene include everything from cell phones and tablet computers to biomedical devices and solar panels.
The use of graphene and other carbon-based nanomaterials, such as carbon nanotubes, are growing rapidly. At the same time, recent studies have suggested graphene oxide may be toxic to humans.
As production of these nanomaterials increase, it is important for regulators, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, to understand their potential environmental impacts, said Jacob D. Lanphere, a UC Riverside graduate student who co-authored a just-published paper about graphene oxide nanoparticles transport in ground and surface water environments.
SNIP
The paper co-authored by Lanphere, “Stability and Transport of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles in Groundwater and Surface Water,” was published in a special issue of the journal Environmental Engineering Science.
[rn: One reason I've been looking at possible sources of graphene/graphene oxide contaminated water because I think it's possible I am ingesting something like it. While the refillable water bottles I use may be a source, I think sources of water available to the public would be strategically more manageable and effective.
So far, links on the water filtration page portray graphene membranes as new to water filtration. Wonder if that's true.
Are there product lines or diffuse networks of overlapping water services woven into our nation that are controlled? The EPA manages water testing- "What could possibly go wrong?"
Didn't President Trump call attention to a specific brand of bottled water? Anyone recall which elite owned it, and/or the brand name? I know Fuji Water was probably one, but I think there was another. Might those be either 'safe' or 'avoid this' messages?
An old, limited source for Q digs once said that the 'elites' remind each other not to drink the water when leaving home (restuarants, hotels etc.) and to take water with them. At the time it was said that they were purposefully avoiding fluoride (drinking water, toothpaste) as it slows cognitive function and encrusts the pineal gland with fluoride deposits.]What if President Trump made a point of drinking water two-handed 'like a child' to warn us to watch out for the water that children are drinking? That happened in 2018 so the water supply may have changed.
If he was demonstrating (messaging)a child drinking two handed, then one possible interpretation was, it was better not to drink bottled water, even at risk of children spilling it all over the floor.Trump drinks water with two hands like a child during big speech on national security - YouTube
rn: Part of the reason I'm thinking along these lines is I came across several Chinese research articles on graphene oxide dated 2018.
I was actually looking for information to find out what might conceivably happen to 'doses' if they contained graphene oxide and were then frozen at the temperatures said to be required by Moderna and Pfizer. Why freeze them?
Searches turned up other graphene oxide research articles - one effort may indicate graphene was being tested for use in ferrying Pb+2 (lead ions) and Cd+2 (cadmium ions) across a porous substance (maybe later, a blood brain barrier?). I recalled that lead was highly damaging to children's developmental health and again thought of PDJT's performance. It may be nothing, but I have graphene oxide on the brain.
Graphene oxide-facilitated transport of Pb2+ and Cd2+ in saturated porous media - ScienceDirect
rn: And/Or perhaps Lead and Cadmium ions could be added to the Covid 'doses,' because they appear to cause neurologic problems and sterility issues that sounded like some of the most severe neurological issues some of the vaccinated were experiencing.
Pb+2 Toxicology (lead ions)
Lead(2+) ion | Pb+2 - PubChem (nih.gov)
Symptoms of alzheimers, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's
Cd+2 Toxicology (cadmium ions)
Cadmium ion | Cd+2 - PubChem (nih.gov)
https://i.imgur.com/wR2wckP.png
https://i.imgur.com/yAPQMkc.png
https://i.imgur.com/kuRhLI3.png
rn: In 2020, Japan was studying how to remove Cd+2 and Pb+2 from environmental/industrial waste. Maybe his issue is not relevant. I might question the timing.
rn: I'm not suggesting all doses are the same. Essentially Americans could provide researchers with a few million unwitting test participants (annual flu 'vaccine') upon which they could run any number of randomized trials using large subsets of the 'vaccinated' and later, use the same method of obtaining unpublicized Covid experiments.
I recall how HIPPA was described by some as similar to The Patriot Act in which it sounded like increased security when in fact it was increased, unrestricted information sharing across the government (loss of privacy).
If true, that would mean the CDC/FDA could access any number of databases to track health records of unwitting trial participants (mortality. side effects).
Given Graphene platelets lacerate lung tissue, and doctors have said that damaged lungs can cause heart health issues, and blood clots where graphene oxide lacerates vessel walls, contamination could explain why we're being told America has an 'epidemic' of cardiac disease.
rn: All things considered, I find it suspicious that the article at the top of my post said people were just getting around to investigating raw graphene oxide and potential toxicity when two sections down, there was research (now deleted from 2021) in the wayback machine dated 2014 warning of contamination of ground water.
I think its bizarre that there are research papers discussing the possible advantages of using graphene oxide as a 'vaccine' adjuvant.
rn: The reason I'm looking along these lines is I seem to benefit from NAC and Glutamate, precursors to Glutathione, but I am not 'vaxxed' and one theory is that the public was primed with GO prior to the opening act of the plandemic. I stopped wearing masks and am just wondring if I should make any changes to sources of water etc.
So let's say graphene filtration systems or some brands at different times of the year may be a 'problem', possibly bursts of doses through some means or steady sources of contaminants in other means. Water filtration, or 'vaccine vials, may be designed to oxidize graphene into graphene oxide. This strategy would be hard to detect.
If there is graphene or GO outside of injections, maybe multiple chemical forms are present in different products? The answers and sources are likely to be complex and overlapping to prevent to avoid detection; it's hard to untangle the mysteries of pathways, sources, products, delivery methods.
rn:Two article I don't have time for. The first may be an example of Q's "baby on floor, hands in mouth" type of indirect exposures.
OUTSIZED IMPACT: GRAPHENE NANOPLATELETS
Posted By Terrance Barkan, Wednesday, July 28, 2021 rn: I'm open to this content, or graphene oxide, not explaining 'Watch the water' but thought I would share what I checked out and mebbe save peeps time.
