Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 07/28/21 Vol.362, Q Day 1370

The following is the computer generated transcript to the video "Dr. Ryan Cole #StoptheMandate - YouTube". It contains phonetic errors and lacks punctuation. The video is 36 minutes in length.

i'm dr ryan cole i'm a board certified

anatomic and clinical pathologist

trained at mayo clinic

i have sub specialty expertise in skin

pathology and fellowship training in

that as well i run a full service

laboratory here in idaho the largest

independent laboratory in the state of

idaho

and i treat patients and have seen

patients in consultation for the last

almost 18 years here from florida to

california

licensed in 12 states and i

am an expert in immunology and virology

as well

one of my board certifications clinical

pathology involves virology i did a year

of phd immunology research my first year

of medical school as well so biology and

immunology

full lab medicine is what i do well

you've been very generous with sharing

your time and your expertise and i

appreciate you taking the time to be

here today for sure

i'd like to pick your brain about how

if they are able to require these

vaccines

from health care professionals how do

you think that that is going to affect

the hospital care or the urgent care

or any kind of doctor care that we

receive as

patients do you think that we'll see

shortages or do you think that

there's just not that many people who

will refuse well let me start by

commenting

we call these vaccines but in the

emergency authorization of these shots

they clearly are using off the term

investigational vaccines

and that's an important point to make

and we are asking people those nurses

those students those employees

to be subjects in an experiment on

humanity

this is a large phase three trial by

getting this shot

of something for which we do not know

the long-term effects and side effects

down the road

and we usually don't see those for two

three four five years

in terms of shortages forcing people to

get this there are people that

value their bodily integrity and as a

hardcore scientist

i'm not political i look at data and

when i look at the data

i'm already seeing the adverse effects

from these shots in the laboratory

setting

so these individuals who are subjecting

themselves

to this just to maintain a job um

we're seeing it in young people

middle-aged people old people

a lot of people are simply not going to

get this shot i've heard administrators

from the system say oh we'll make you

cave you'll cave

i have plenty of nurses who have shared

with me that that's the

mantra within administration we're going

to make you cave

they won't they will leave they will

stand for principle and their bodily

integrity and their long-term health

and they have every right to do that to

not be a subject in

in human experimentation and coercion

so they're going to see huge staffing

shortages

huge i have a friend in indiana reached

out today and looked at a couple

articles from there

there are already shortages in their in

their staffing within their hospital

system

they're trying to do the same thing

another physician group out of michigan

same thing they already have shortages

now they're going to have massive

shortages

so this isn't just a mandate on

employees of a health care system

this is a mandate and an attack on an

entire community and an entire

community's wellness

and access to care they pride themselves

with

these institutions to say oh we're here

for the patient we're here for the

community

this clearly says they're not it is it

is literally the antithesis of that

they're flipping the script and and

giving a you know

mellifluous uh commentary on how much

they're here for us but they're

literally attacking us and our access to

care because those nurses

don't want their bodies damaged they

don't want their fertility damage

they don't want their long-term immune

health damage they don't want to

increase their risk for cancers

that i'm seeing the signals in the

laboratory already

they don't want to subject themselves to

that and they should not have to be

coerced into an experimental shot

as it says in the emergency

authorization investigational vaccine

in order to maintain employment this is

a violation we made

a promise in 1947 after world war ii

that we

never again would experiment on humanity

or coerce

anybody against their will and

literally this is what we're seeing i

mean there were nazi nurses

and doctors hung for doing exactly what

we're doing to humanity right now saying

you will participate in an experiment or

else you will lose your job

and and we are taking away the freedom

and sovereignty of people over their

bodies and their minds as

well we're doing this through we've had

three options this year we've had

fear suffering and vaccine

really the option is hope early

treatment

and immune wellness and we as a society

have been subject to

you know a worse outcome of this disease

because we haven't focused on some of

the basic public health messages

yes it's in some of the talks people

have seen me give we are a vitamin d

deficient nation

magnesium and vitamin k2 as well we're

an obese nation we're a metabolically

unwell nation

and those have predisposed us to the

poorer

outcomes compared to other nations

and now we're trying to force people

into a shot and and this is abject

silliness

we're trying to force people into a shot

for last year's virus

this is delta this is this is not wuhan

strain this is delta now this is the

india strain

but what you don't hear is delta is

uh a less malevolent virus

yes it's spreading faster certainly but

it's less

virulent so this virus if you look at

the data out of india

and you don't hear this in the media

sure it's a big nation a lot of people

and their raw numbers of

infection and and hospitalization and

death seem high

but statistically their death rate was

one-seventh that of the western world

that's good news viruses acquire

benevolent mutations over time we call

it muller's ratchet as you look at the

inbreeding of something over time

it becomes less strong this same concept

is happening with this virus already

now it's interesting to note that in the

uk right

now there are about fifteen thousand

documented breakthrough cases a day

in the vaccinated by the delta variant

the delta variant these vaccines based

on the statistical modeling one would

have to do

to get approval for these as an

emergency authorization

this shot would not be authorized for

delta statistically right now

um it and when we see this data out of

israel

the the other important thing i think

that we're leaving out is the fact that

natural immunity is already broad across

the nation

for every couple of cases that you know

we document elaborate in the laboratory

there are multiple people who've had the

infection we are not screening before

vaccine

the huge amount of adverse reactions

we're seeing

are people who are infected with virus

and getting a shot while they're

infected

and then the antibodies you form are

attacking the organs in your body

also those who have already mounted an

immunity against sars cov2

if they get a vaccine they are multiple

fold increased risk of adverse reactions

because they've already had cove but

they already have immunity

and it puts their immune system in a

hyper-immune response

so we're negating natural immunity in

israel just last week a study came out

that showed in breakthrough cases from

those who had already had

sars kobe 2 and natural immunity

versus those that who had had the

vaccine the

the recurrent infection rate in those

that were naturally immune

was eight one thousandths of a percent

reacquisition of virus

the vaccinated got delta strain

and this virus at a seven times higher

rate than those who are naturally immune

clearly indicating that natural immunity

is a stronger immunity than

a vaccine immunity from a leaky vaccine

this isn't this is not a sterilizing

vaccine it doesn't give you immunity

you can still get covid and the other

important thing that the cdc

admits they're not doing other nations

are listened to a great uh

lecture out of the uk today is the

vaccinated can still acquire the virus

and can still transmit the virus

at least 25 of those vaccinated are

still transmitting virus

out of the uk data from yesterday so

these are leaky vaccines we're trying to

force people

into it into an experiment with an

investigational vaccine

for a investigational vaccine against a

virus from a year ago

for a new strain that is out now now we

can't play this whack-a-mole oh let's

which strain next which strain next you

we can barely get people quote

vaccinated now

by the end of the year maybe we're on

strain zeta of the virus

so what do we need to focus on we need

to focus on early treatment of this

virus

and it's widely available and it's cheap

and it's generic and that's why it's not

approved

because if there were a treatment for

this virus they

cannot have authorization for these

vaccines period states

i think about page three in the

emergency authorization it states

clearly you cannot authorize this

investigational vaccine

if there's an effective therapy for this

virus well

many of my colleagues around the country

and myself have worked on early

therapies for this virus dr peter

peter mccola out of texas the most

published cardiologist in the world

and the most published cardiologist or

the most published physician on covet

over 50

articles on kobet this past year and he

has focused on early treatment

the death rate in his cohort and those

of us that have used the mccola

protocols is 86 percent lower than the

hospitals

86 percent lower in prevention trials

with many of these early treatments and

prophylactic treatments out of argentina

dr carvalho's study showed a 100 percent

prevention of acquisition of sarge kov2

on patients that were on

prophylactic ivermectin and ivermectin

has it's a molecule so i've been

criticized in the media about

speaking about this medication the

molecule doesn't read a textbook and say

i can only treat parasites

this molecule and this was a paper in

nature one of the biggest scientific

journals in the world

this molecule has 22 mechanisms of

action against stars cov2

has seven or eight antiviral mechanisms

and it has multiple immune modification

mechanisms

in dr carvalho's study two months of

healthcare workers taking ivermectin

once a week 800 individuals

zero got covered in the placebo control

group of 400 people

57 percent in the placebo group got

coveted

that's how effective ivermectin was at

preventing acquisition of

kobe 2 in a hospital setting you can't

claim that for these vaccines

you know these vaccines you know they

claim 90 95 percent

uh efficacy really what that is and i

could get in

into statistics that's that's risk

reduction

um your relative risk the what they

didn't do

and and the fda failed in this and they

they allowed them not to submit

the numbers for the absolute risk

reduction the arr

so it literally takes 120 people to get

two shots

to decrease symptoms in one one patient

and so of those 120 how many people are

going to end up with autoimmune disease

two to three years down the road

how many are going to end up with cancer

two to three years down the road

or four or five years we don't know but

here's what i'm seeing in the laboratory

already and this is

very very concerning um

when we give these shots we can look at

the

types of white blood cells in the body

we can look at your t cells your b

cells the ratios and and you have a

broad array

of immune cells that work together to

fight off viruses

to keep cancers in check we're already

seeing the signals in the laboratory

of decreases of certain critically

important t

cells that you need your innate immune

system it's it's your marines of your

body the first ones in fighting off

viruses fighting off cancers

it's why kids have done phenomenally

well and survive this virus at a hundred

percent rate

statistically this year because they

have a an innate t cell immune response

that has two to three times the activity

of an adult t cell

immune response they have two to three

times the enzymes that

throw the little hand grenades in the

cells and blow up the infected cells

compared to adults and that's why kids

have done so wonderfully against this

virus but what we're seeing in the

laboratory after people get these shots

we're seeing a very concerning locked in

low profile

of these important killer t cells that

you want in your body it's almost a

reverse hiv in hiv you lose your helper

cells your cd4 cells in this virus post

vaccine what we're seeing is a drop in

your killer t cells your cd8

cells and what did cdh cells do they

keep all other viruses in check what am

i seeing in the laboratory i'm seeing an

uptick of herpes family viruses i'm

seeing

herpes i'm seeing shingles i'm seeing

mono i'm seeing

a huge uptick in human papillomavirus uh

the cervical biopsies in the cervical

pap smears in women

in addition to that there's a little

infectious you know bump the kids get

called molluscum contagiosum

what do you need to keep that in check

you need cd8 killer t cells

i am seeing a 20 times increase in

individuals over the age of 50 of this

little bump and rash um you know that's

innocuous

but what it tells me is the immune

status of these individuals who have

gotten the shot

we're literally weakening the immune

system of these individuals now most

concerning of all

is there's a pattern of these types of

immune cells in the body that keep

cancer in check

well since january 1 in the laboratory

i've seen

a 20 times increase of endometrial

cancers over what i see on an annual

basis

a 20 times increase i'm not exaggerating

at all

because i look at my numbers year over

year oh my gosh i've never seen this

many

endometrial cancers before i'm seeing

invasive melanomas in younger patients

normally we catch those early and

they're thin melanomas i'm seeing thick

melanomas

skyrocketing in the last month or two

i'm already seeing the early signals and

we are modifying the immune system to a

weakened state

great study out of germany that looked

at these profiles on

young individuals after the pfizer

showing

this locked in and we don't know how

long maybe the immune system

you know is going to regenerate and

those ratios will go back up

but who's studying it and where are the

long-term trials

two months four months how long is this

profile locked in we don't know

and how how long is it going to last two

to three years

what what is going to be the uptick in

these solid tumor cancers over the next

two three four five years we don't know

i can predict i'm a data analyst i'm not

a politician i look at data and i'm

already seeing

concerning patterns and so to say to

somebody in order to maintain your job

you need to put your body at risk

and let us change your immune status for

potentially a lifetime and put you at

risk for autoimmune disease

cancer here's here's a very very

important one

in the pfizer application to the fda

now the problem with most of these shots

is we didn't do animal trials before

doing human trials the humans

essentially were the guinea pigs

and in one of their addendums that they

throw in it shows their study on

rats and fertility and we've heard you

know

inklings within the media and some

scientific reporting well

what's going to be the fertility

long-term outcome the honest answers we

don't know

but in the pfizer study the fertility

rate was decreased by 16

now 16 percent you think yeah that's not

a whole lot well rats are one of the

most fertile creatures on the planet

earth a 16 percent decrease in fertility

in rats

is at least a signal that says to us we

need to be hyper cautious about what

we're doing

and again an experiment on humanity and

to coerce somebody

into an experiment in order to keep

their gainful employment

it's a violation of all medical ethics i

mean this is this is pure malfeasance

uh from administrators and and

i i think at some point my physician

colleagues may wake up from their stupor

and trance that they're in

and reflect upon the harm that they're

doing upon humanity

you know we have a mantra we have a

narrative of oh

suffering fear shot suffering fear shot

never in the humanity in the middle of a

pandemic if we said oh let's vaccinate

during a pandemic

no you literally select for variants

when you're vaccinating

in the middle of a pandemic it's immuno

immunologically illogical

to do something of this sort and we're

we are doing

doing something that is anti-science we

hear

the science this year well i'm a

scientist there's no such thing as the

science if

if there were the science we would stop

doing science science

is hypothesizing theorizing testing

succeeding failing taking that

hypothesis and theory and then

remodifying and doing something again

that's what we need to be doing we don't

need to be willy-nilly pushing forward

with something we don't know the

outcomes of

and subject people to it um it's

unethical

you know i took a i took an oath to

first do no harm that's psychological

harm physical harm on financial harm to

a patient

and i i i'm calling out my physician

colleagues within these large

administrations and health system

you are violating your oath you are

violating your oath

you you claim to care for humanity but

you are literally taking the opportunity

to harm humanity

we're at a pandemic where we're at

endemic levels right now we're in a

state of 1.7 million people and we see

maybe 100 cases a day the virus right

now around the state

that's not pandemic levels that's

endemic levels is the virus going to be

with us

yes well we need to look at early

treatments we need to look at

being honest with the population and

give a public health message

let's take care of our health let's

optimize our immune health let's be less

metabolically unwell let's let's focus

on natural health

natural immunity let's focus on if you

get the virus we're going to treat you

right away we're not going to send you

home and say okay in five seven ten days

when your lips are blue you come to the

hospital we'll put you on a ventilator

give you a little bit of oxygen

a weak steroid of calling you out on the

steroids you're using you're using the

weakest one of possible possible

and you're you're afraid to look at the

protocols of the front line

code critical care doctors flccc.net

these are some of the premier uh

critical care doctors in the world they

have protocols

they're saving patients 70 80 90 more

than you are in your hospitals right now

and you are following the government the

nih and you are following

um very weak protocols and the

government is about six to nine months

behind on

on science not the science they're about

six to nine months behind

it's time for you and the hospitals to

catch up with the protocols that are far

more successful than what you are doing

you know the definition of stupidity is

to do the same thing over and over and

expect a different result

well you know i've talked to countless

patients and their doctors won't do

anything different they're not being

critical thinkers they're not thinking

outside the box

they're not stepping into these realms

of okay what we're doing isn't working

we can add this in there's certainly no

harm in doing it

you know some of these early treatment

medications are the safest medicines on

the planet one of them has been around

almost four decades

the other almost seven decades and we

have the safety profile some of the

safest drugs on earth on the who's list

of most essential safest drugs necessary

for humanity

and we have foolish physicians saying oh

gosh you know i need a randomized

control placebo trial blah blah blah

like look it's a sugar pill if it

doesn't work and it's a lifesaver if it

does

and and we're ignoring real science

because

out of 19 000 patients in studies on

ivermectin

and you know 26 29 randomized controlled

trials

there's a one in four quadrillion chance

one in four quadrillion chance

statistically that this

medication this molecule does not have

an effect in improving

the outcomes in sarge kov2 statistically

the meta-analyses

the a meta-analysis the gold standard

in medicine you you have some small

trials small trials small trials you add

them all up and then you look at the

statistical power of all those trials

put together

the gold standard is a meta-analysis the

meta-analytical data independently done

out of five nations

shows that iver mechner works against

sarge kobe two given

late you decrease death rate by about 68

70 percent given early

you decrease that death rate by 88 to 96

percent

so we need to look at early treatments

we need to quit subjecting people to a

shot for the witch

many are dying over 9 000 reported to

bears

in in the last six months 9048 deaths

reported

that's a red flag system we're ignoring

the forest on fire in the smoke signal

and you cannot approve

through the fda stop valve a vaccine

after 25

deaths that's the fda stop valve if they

see 25 deaths

in a medication drug vaccine trial they

pull it

i mean there may be a reason that

they're keeping this as an experiment

and as an emergency authorization

because if it were to go for approval

unless they pull some shenanigans this

would be pulled

immediately and should be and my medical

opinion should be

and and we're ignoring the statistics of

how well people are doing against this

virus under age 50 99.9

survival rate those who are passing are

are ones with comorbidities and if we

did early treatments

instead of our our abject weak

uh approach to this virus that would

statistically be about 100

survival under age 50. so we need to

have

courage when we need to have logic and

we need to

step outside of these realms of of

coercion

because this is a survivable survival

bulldog

excuse me a survivable virus

and and we're not getting that hopeful

message

and then and and and in addition to that

you know we're getting these

well gosh we need to vaccinate the kids

no we don't leave them alone

leave them alone they survive this at

100 we are seeing a

200 times increase in young men

increase of inflammation of the heart

over baseline what we would see on an

annual basis in north america

once your heart is damaged it's damaged

for a lifetime

your heart cells don't grow back that's

that scarring that happens

next don't let your child near these

shots

and again we don't know the long-term

immune effects we don't know the

long-term cancer effects we don't know

the long-term fertility effects

any university that is mandating this

for their students it is

criminal it is criminal it is criminal

these these young healthy individuals

are at no risk for death from this virus

we have treatments and we are ruining

the health of a generation and killing

them as well

and this is unethical this is a

violation of all morality

let alone medical ethics this is immoral

this is immoral i'm calling you out this

is immoral

step back and look at the data forget

the politics forget your business

forget you know forget who you think you

are at the end of the day we're all

human

and this is immoral to be doing this

to young individuals in our society and

our population what would you say to the

new messaging that is that this new

variant

is the variant of the unvaccinated it's

a scary ant

and it's a lie um and good

it's a common cold in the unvaccinated

the majority of people if you're if

you're healthy and well great

it's turning into what all coronaviruses

become over time

it's turning into a common cold for most

people if you have risk factors

look i'm not i'm not anti-vaccine i am

i'm pro-good science

you know your body your choice if you

want to be

a subject in an experiment you think

it's going to be a benefit

to you your body your choice be fully

informed of what the risks are

i don't think we need to be coercing

people into

a shop where one of the potential side

effects is death

in order to keep your job you have to

get a shot for the witch one of the side

effects is death

is that right that's not moral that's

not ethical

the delta variant i call them scary ants

they're 99.7 to 99.9

the same virus and again i'll go back to

an earlier point

it's a benevolent mutation it is acting

more like a common cold why do we have

runny nose as one of the symptoms now

for this virus

because it's acting slightly differently

it's weakening it's not killing people

at a higher rate

but those who've been vaccinated are

getting dealt at a higher rate than

those who have natural immunity

so viruses always mutate and it's going

to be among us for a long time probably

as a an endemic buzz level

so instead of thinking okay well let's

chase

chase this variant this scary ant with a

shot i like to call them samians

it's the same virus this isn't stars

cov3 yet

um now here's here's an immune problem

we form an antibody to this virus and

antibody is forever

once you form it if you have a good

antibody fantastic great grandma still

has immunity to measles from when she

was kid

but if you form a bad antibody and you

do end up with stars kovi three

two three four years from now that

that antibody and this is called immune

priming you're now primed with an

antibody that down the road is your

enemy

because now you're immune primed to

hyper react to the next variant of this

virus

or this next basically speciation of the

virus of sarge kov3

in the animal trials with sars kovi one

we learned

if you vaccinate the animals with the

spike protein against stars kobe 1 they

formed an antibody

wonderful great look an immune response

however

when they were exposed to wild type

virus down the road

a high percentage of those animals died

very quickly and in another percentage

in an amount

study they had a hundred percent lung

inflammation of a particular

type eosinophil a type of very

inflammatory white blood cell

in the lungs of those mice so

you may form an antibody and say hooray

look we're forming immunity within

this population but at the end of the

day when exposed to

something different enough than what the

vaccine was

you are damaging those individuals we

know those signals from sarge cov1 we've

seen this

in in cat coronavirus vaccines where

cats ended up with this

horrible inflammation swelling of the

stomach and about 30 percent of the cats

died

so we know once you prime somebody with

an antibody

and that antibody is good great but if

you prime them with an antibody that is

not good

sit back and pull out the popcorn

because we're going to be seeing

something horrific happening

immunologically to a population down the

road

the honest answer is we don't know to

what degree but

we do know the history of this and

history is one of the best teachers that

we have

it's let's look at the history of this

family of virus this is an influenza

this is not influenza this isn't a

common cold this is a different family

of viruses and we know our success with

other vaccines with other viruses that's

fine

but this one we have a very horrific

track record with coronavirus vaccines

and mammal trials

and there's a reason the fda never let

coronavirus sarsko v1 vaccines come to

the market

and never let mers vaccines come to the

market every time they saw the signals

and they said

this is too dangerous for humanity well

this virus is eighty percent the same as

cellars cov1

why would they not have that same

mindset now we know

how horrifically kobe 1 and merge

vaccines

failed and now without long-term safety

data we're pushing forward

an investigational vaccine on a

population

without knowing those long-term signals

it's crime against humanity

period it hasn't been lost on me that so

many healthcare practitioners the people

who are administering the vaccine or

seeing the effects of the vaccine

don't want this shot right even if

you're not a data person you can see

that they've made this decision for

themselves

they're willing to risk their career

over it they don't want to have the

shock

even if you're not a data person that

should tell you something

very pointed something that there are

certain people who don't want to be an

experiment and maybe somebody should

second-guess that right

so what would you say to the healthcare

practitioners who are afraid of losing

their license who are afraid of losing

their careers

but they want to take a stand and

they're looking for some kind of

direction

i'm sure they're coming to you like

they're coming to me like they're

they're asking

help me what do i do how do i do it

and you know give me some direction

right that's what i hear all day long

so what are you saying to people when

they're reaching out to you three things

number one natural immunity is better

than a vaccine immunity

so if you've had sars cov2 and it's time

for the establishment to wake up

it's it's there if you and a lot of

health care workers have already had

stars go cov2

they are more immune than the vaccinated

so that should be

equal in this medical social uh

status that they're trying to invoke if

you have had sars kogi-2 you have

a broader immunity than anyone who's

gotten a vaccine

because you have antibodies against the

spike the envelope the membrane the

nucleocapsid you have

hundreds of antibodies compared to maybe

dozens from the vaccine

so number one you have a broader

immunity if you've had stars kobe 2.

okay if you haven't

well there are plenty of people with

underlying health conditions

this shot is clearly a contraindication

to many people with underlying health

conditions

as well now i think another important

point is many people have religious

convictions

that you know under the civil rights act

you

cannot be questions on your religious

convictions you have a right to refuse

based on

religious grounds pfizer moderna

don't contain aborted fetal cells but

they were developed on aborted fetal

cells

and they were proved and processed on

aborted fetal cells

j j is grown on aborted fetal cells and

may contain human dna as well as human

protein

per their application to the fda jnj has

a human fetal dna and protein in it

period moderna and pfizer were developed

using aborted fetal cells i think for

many of us that matters

so there's another religious argument

number one natural immunity

number two plenty of people have

underlying health conditions that make

them

you know at a very uh high increased

risk for adverse reactions from these

shots

and number three on religious grounds or

on just moral and ethical grounds alone

it doesn't even have to be religious if

you're not religious but on moral and

ethical grounds alone

that those three should be an exemption

you need to speak out

you need to stand up there are those of

us fighting

this insanity but you need to join us

and i know we're banding together

um but again moral

ethics we're throwing them out the

window

for something we don't know that the

long-term outcomes for

and and this is it's an absurdity what

we're experiencing

it's time for people to wake up it's

time for providers to stand up

and it's time for us to band together

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.