you’re hedging
please explain why an asymptomatic who doesn’t believe he’s sick, should be treated differently from a vaccinated who doesn’t believe he’s sick.
An asymptomatic may actually be pre-symptomatic and contageous for several days. The same thing you’re accusing vaccinated of. An asymptomatic challenged with a stronger virus or viral load may become symptomatic. Your argument isn’t valid.
Additionally another claim of asymptomatics was they had no duty to provide protection to an unvaccinated person. It was the personal responsibility of the unvaccinated person. (the old, assys telling old folks to stay home argument). Are you now saying the vaccinated old folks have a duty to provide protection for asymptomatics and the unvaccinated? Do you see the double standard yet?
For the record, I dont’ believe either are capable of spreading disease unless a someone licks an asymptomatic’s nose or the asymptomatic turns out to be a pre-symptomatic. Symptoms aren’t the only indicator of peak viral load but it’s a pretty good one. Vaccinated, for the most part, don’t let the virus get to peak viral load.
Nothing you’re saying is true. I think I’ve had enough of ‘it’ for the day.