“You and your man-crush Fauci”...”Nobody cares about your Clintonian quibble over semantics.”
Except Fauxi and his handlers. I never wrote that Paul was wrong about Fauxi, but he’s horribly ignorant about GOF and Fauxi called him out on it.
Many FReepers are as well. That’s a shame, but it happens here with EVERY controversial topic.
They’re in full attack mode to defend the status quo and you deny the obvious, now stated clearly for the first time (in spite of the prognostications of other ignoramuses).
Maybe you should read my WHOLE post and see the very last line.
How do you type with your head so far up your backside?
“I never wrote that Paul was wrong about Fauxi, but he’s horribly ignorant …”
There you go playing around with semantics again. He’s not wrong, but he’s horribly ignorant? What complete and utter horse shit.
Just admit what you are - don’t try to play both sides - it makes you sound trollish.
“I never wrote that Paul was wrong about Fauxi, but he’s horribly ignorant about GOF and Fauxi called him out on it.”
Bullcrap. Paul used the historic and well understood definition. Fauci tried to defend himself using HIS newly created term which was designed to skirt the law. Paul insisted on staying in reality and didn’t buy into Fauci’s fraud and word games.