[monkeyshine]

You underlined the wrong part IMO. To me the key words are "may be effective at preventing..."

[rxsid]

"You underlined the wrong part IMO. To me the key words are "may be effective at preventing...""

That highlights the point even more. Additionally, that "may" language is only in Pfizer's EUA.

May prevent.

The other two.

Prevent.

They're EUA's should be yanked.

But prevention of covid is NOT what anyone pushing the experimental vaccines is talking about anymore. They're saying...hey, the death rate is down among the vaccinated.

Well, that's NOT what their EUA's are based on.

They are based on preventing covid.

If science and honestly were in play, their authorization to distribute and administer outside an actual enrolled study would be revoked.

[rxsid]

Put another way...

"may prevent" would be satisfied if 1 in 1 million were prevented from getting covid, but the other 999,999 got it.

Hey...we never said it was 100% effective. We said it "may" prevent.

No. all the vaccines EUA's, and promotion at the start was based on preventing covid.