https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
On November 20, 2020, Pfizer and BioNTech (the Sponsor) submitted an Emergency Use
Authorization (EUA) request to FDA for an investigational COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2)
intended to PREVENT COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
(SARS-CoV-2). The vaccine is based on the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (S) antigen
encoded by RNA and formulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The proposed use under an EUA
is “for active immunization for the PREVENTION of COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in
individuals 16 years of age and older.”
Now that it doesn’t work, they change the story, as it was never meant to prevent covid.
[quote]"Prevention of Covid-19"[end quote].
There is mounting evidence of breakthrough cases.
If this virus wasn't so politicized, their EUA would be pulled and told to go back to more testing without the EUA.
Yeah well the Sponsor can write whatever they want in their application. Doesn’t make it so. Clearly the agenda they are pushing now is that it doesn’t prevent infection or spread of the disease. And we can see that on the news with vaccinated people testing positive from olympians to sports teams to celebrities to these nursing home people; restaurants are closing again around my town (of their own choice) because vaxxed staff have tested positive.
And now look at this link below. I saw some of the early trial data reviews and they showed that the vaccine’s first shot work really good (aside from whatever side/after effects they may create) for about 5 weeks. Then their efficacy starts to drop. I presume that is why they made it a 2-dose regimen. But now, they are saying even after 2 doses, 10 weeks it drops from the purported 95% to 50%. 2nd shot doesn’t appear to add any additional value to the immune system except maybe a few extra weeks of good protection.
“UK scientists back Covid boosters as study finds post-jab falls in antibodies”