That a feature, not a bug.
Once vaccines were rolled out, they also changed who would be tested and how they would be tested.
The PCR test is not valid for Covid, but let’s play along for a moment because they are using it anyway.
The vaccinated PCR tests will be run at a lower number of cycles resulting in fewer false positives.
The unvaccinated PCR tests will continue to be run at levels which render them meaningless due to high false postives of over 97%.
This is the only way they could make it seem like people benefitted from the vaccines.
Pfizer’s trial data showed less than 200 among the unvaccinated, and less than 20 among the vaccinated tested positive for Covid-19, using the invalid PCR test.
But a few thousand people appeared to be ill, and yet the invalid PCR test results were negative. So Pfizer called these groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated trial participatns who appeared to be ill but with negative PCR tests, “Suspected Covid” and DID NOT COUNT THEM in the trial data.
Had those people been counted as Covid based on symptoms, Pfizer’s ‘vaccine’ would be around 19% ‘effective’ using the silly Relative Risk calculations that ‘vaccine’ companies use.
You mentioned a couple important points. The inconsistency in data collection and methodologies throughout the last year and a half has made meaningful analysis nearly impossible, and generated a lot of well-deserved skepticism. The CDC no longer has any credibility.