Posted on 07/21/2021 7:14:59 PM PDT by Tipllub
Also, the PCR test has diagnosed fruit, goats, Spanish Water and Coca Cola as Covid positive because the 'test' is checking for a molecular sequence that is not unique to Covid. The PCR test is really fake and they know it. THere's someone out there publishing the WHO's version of the PCR (there are multiple versions of the PCR) which shows the test is designed to detect a a molecular sequence which also happens to match a fragment of all human DNA. They chose a test they could make say anything they wanted it to say, and they are sticking with it.
~~~~Below, a quote from a prior article~~~~~~~~~~
The inventor of the PCR, Kary Mullis said it was not accurate for detecting disease.
That’s the message attorney Anthony Raimondo is trying to get out to the public.....“Well, one of the things that I’ve learned is how shocking it is that this PCR test is really not even a test,” he said. “Its inventor was a guy name Kary Mullis who was a Nobel Prize winning scientist, and he himself actually tangled quite a bit with our good friend Dr. Fauci. He called Fauci a fraud. And he was persistent that his invention, the PCR Assay, is not a test. It is not a diagnostic tool and was never intended to be used as a diagnostic tool.”
Further distorting the PCR 'results', these assays were meant to run at 15 cycles, but the Covid collabortor running them at 40+ cycles so that they make it seem like a meaningless amount of material in sample is preseent at higher concentrationst than it actually is.
While the PCR 'should' theoretically test for a fragment of material unique to the Covid-19 virus, they configured this 'assay' to detect fragments of material present in more than just the virus, so it has about a 90% false positive rate:
Mullis was one Trippy dude
There are 10 million people in LA county!
3 million in next door Orange county.
This 2,551 is not even a drop in the bucket plus we know the tests are not accurate by a long shot!
I’m not sure that it needs to be in great numbers. Polymerase chain reaction can detect the presence of protein fragments associated with a virus, but not the viral load in a specific sample. It can’t tell us whether someone is ‘infectious’, or even ‘sick’. Many people may have been exposed to such a tiny bit of the virus that it will show up in the ‘test’, but won’t mean anything to their health or to that of those around them.
But in any large epidemic or pandemic, I’m sure that there’s enough of the stuff going around that it could easily be found in almost anything anywhere - like ‘orange juice’, for instance.
As I understand it, the test DOES detect evidence of the virus; it just doesn’t tell us what that evidence really means. What worries me is how much our real disease statistics have been inflated by a mere minute ‘infection’ - and how many people we quarantined for two weeks who were no danger at all.
Unfortunately, Mullis died a few months before anyone had ever heard of this ‘China Virus’, so we don’t have the benefit of his opinion on this specific issue, now. But there are interviews with him still living on YouTube.
My favorite is a TedX talk he gave that doesn’t have anything to do with disease, but with his very early forays into Science:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSVy1b-RyVM
You seem pretty ‘trippy’ yourself. You should be so brilliant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.