you might find this interesting - study caveat: one mega dose as opposed to a 3-day lower-dose course:
https://www.foxnews.com/health/covid-19-antibiotic-azithromycin-flops-clinical-trial-experts-weigh-in
nix HCQ and ivermectin. see:Brazil and multiple clinical studies
If you get sick, best to seek medical care and not try to wing it with home recipies. The variants are faster replicating so time is of the essence moreso than with the original Wuhan.
“nix HCQ and ivermectin”
__________
Nix? In favor of what other effective antiviral age capable of quickly knocling down one’s viral load and giving one’s body and immune system the boost it needs to fully overcome the infection in mere days or a week?
__________
“If you get sick, best to seek medical care and not try to wing it with home recipies. The variants are faster replicating so time is of the essence moreso than with the original Wuhan.”
__________
Who said anything about not seeking the care of a medical doctor or trying to wing it with a home remedy?
The thing is, media and medical journals by now are thoroughly corrupted. Anyone who poor mouths HCQ or Ivermectin by now is indifferent toward your death. A doctor with clinical experience and in-house success treating COVID-19 patients by keeping their nappy rear ends the hell out of the hospital and allowing them to recover and convalesce at home is the gold standard. Accept nothing less.
Yet another study that tries to discredit at least one element of simple, proven effective, early treatment by isolating it in a protocol never recommended or used in reported positive results.
Don’t fall for that.