Given the favorable balance of risks you’ve cited, would you be in favor of mandating the jab, either by federal law, or by the present method (nearly unavoidable government-encouraged coercion).?
Nope. Nothing in the Constitution gives the Government authority to force any medical treatment on its citizens, and the long term medical consequences from the jab are not known.
However, I personally have the vaccine, because I figure that at 62 with a minor heart issue I didn't have to worry too much about long term ill effects 30 years from now.
I do worry about an entire generation coming down with Hodgkin's Disease or some such 30 years from now because of the jab.