[DesertRhino]

https://www.salk.edu/news-release/the-novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays-additional-key-role-in-illness/

No evidence except a little hole in the wall place known as “The Salk Institute”.

4/30/21

[ColoCdn]

They rely on “Health Feedback”, a fact checker, and “Politifact”, eh?

Yeah, well I’m sure that’s worth my trust.
We don’t need no steenkin’ Salk Institute.

[caseinpoint]

I see the Salk article claims the disease spike protein is harmful but it also notes the vaccine spike protein is different (or behaves differently). There is no discussion of the difference but the article doesn’t back up the headline that the vaccine protein is toxic.

[Jane Long]

In actual fact, the two spike proteins behave very differently in the body. ....

Odd....the Salk Institute link (in article, as ‘proof’), doesn’t even mention the experimental shot spike proteins, or the shot, at all.

Whoever these ‘fact checkers’ are.....they’ve failed..

Another oddity....they mention where Dr Bridle is wrong, but then they list stats/adverse effects, etc., that prove him right.

[arthurus]

Well Salk is passe8 and not hip to the Narration Based New Science.

[joshua c]

but but but they have fact checkers