Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AC86UT89

You bring up an interesting point. If cruise lines operated under DeSantis’ ban of proof-of-vaccination, you suggest that they could have done this by “spreading the risk” with insurers.

I’m not so sure that’s a bad idea. Right now, the individual is expected to take all if the risk with both the virus, itself, and this hastily contrived and untested vaccine.

I believe that insurers have been largely sitting this out, or I certainly haven’t heard of insurance adaptations to COVID or the vaccine. I can’t imagine that insurers want to cover ramifications of the vaccine.

Maybe it would have been a good idea to see cruising pick back up DeSantis’ way, since the vaccine is its own political football.


11 posted on 07/19/2021 1:38:42 PM PDT by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Empire_of_Liberty

“If cruise lines operated under DeSantis’ ban of proof-of-vaccination, you suggest that they could have done this by “spreading the risk” with insurers.”
———————-

What I was referring to was the Royal Caribbean strategy for dealing with the DeSantis et al edicts by requiring passengers to purchase expensive health insurance policies. Presumably this would discourage non-vaccinated passengers by increasing their net price to cruise- maybe $700 per cruise for non-vaccinateds according to one report I saw.


12 posted on 07/19/2021 2:08:41 PM PDT by AC86UT89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson