Logically makes absolutely no {censored} sense. If people are now "vaccinated" and more are getting "vaccinated" and if these "vaccines" work at all then the net risk is going down.
To claim that risk is increasing while the percentage of the population vaccinated is going up is a tacit admission that the so-called vaccine is BS. Or that they are just throwing out FUD.
the net risk is to 51% of the population. Removing under 18s from the equasion, the net risk is to around 30% of the population, or about 100 million folks.
the US has used 88% of it’s allocated ‘first round’ 300+ million shots. Unvaccinated slots were taken by those getting their second shot.
fully vaccinated is the key phrase
for J*J that’s 15 days post shot
for P and M that’s shot, wait 30 days, shot, wait 15 days or about six weeks until peak protection (England extended this interval to 6 to 8 weeks with mixed results and I think are going back to 30 day intervals)
novavax, seeking approval, I believe is also a one-shot and AstraZeneca used in the UK/EU is two-shots
To be noted, the same foreign countries who didn’t want to be guinea pigs for ‘western’ medicine, are now whining that western nations are already distributing second shots when they have none at all. Racial politics (CRT) is putting pressure on western nations to finish vaccinations so the 3rd world can get all the vaccines.
https://usafacts.org/visualizations/covid-vaccine-tracker-states/
Why is it that no one continues to ask or demand a response to this very question?
If you are vaccinated, and presumably safe, why do you care whether someone else is or isn’t? If you are vaccinated, why are you insisting I must be as well. You bear no risk regarding whether or not I am vaccinated.