Antibody production when challenged by the disease (secondary infection) is SUPPOSED to be higher among the vaccinated. That is how immune response fights the disease.
It is not ADE, it is a normal heightened immune response - the goal of vaccination. Performing as designed.
OK, time for another one of these. My positions -
1) bioethics require full risk disclosure and free choice. Neither of these are being met.
2) For high risk populations, the risk/benefit ratio for the USA vaccines seem to make sense.
3) We do not know all the risks yet.— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 19, 2021
4) for pediatric and young adult populations, the data do not currently support adequate risk/benefit for USA vaccines. So stop.
5) mandating vaccines is wrong
6) censorship is wrong
7) attacking others credibility as a way to win arguments is the refuge of the stupid— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 19, 2021
8) Dr. @GVDBossche is completely correct as a virologist and vaccinologist in everything that I have read of his. Time will prove him right - I am confident in that. But IMO as a physician, the death and disability in the high risk populations still merits vaccination— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 19, 2021
9) There is a concerted effort to suppress information and dissent in support of the nobel lie— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 19, 2021
10) the noble lie is-
a. we have to reach herd immunity for economic recovery and to minimize death and disability
b. these genetic vaccines are the only path available to herd immunity
c. these genetic vaccines are perfectly safe
Each of these statements are demonstrably false.— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 19, 2021
ADE is the bear in the woods, and could change everything. I am referring to current, well supported data. At this point, I still put ADE in the "unproven risk" column, and continue to watch carefully. Aspects of the data are pointing towards this being a true risk.— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 19, 2021
"no known comorbidities" is the key concept. As one gets older, most of us no longer meet that criterion. Strictly speaking the line may be at the 65-70yo range. Rigorously answering this requires full actuarial analysis, which has not been disclosed to the public if performed— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 19, 2021
no, not at this time. I took moderna x2 and had long lasting side effects. And statements about vaccine "treating" long covid are irresponsible. This hypothesis needs to be prospectively assessed in clinical trials before being treated as fact.— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 19, 2021