The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles
Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science
—
Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y
Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette
https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp
Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts
If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc. ~Jim Robinson
The issue isn’t whether we allow skepticism, it is whether we allow hyperskeptics and skeptopaths to ruin the scientific dialog. Civil discussion of the involved science is desired.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6619-nkodama-s-merged-thread-top/?postID=160085#post160085
nkodama
Member
Reactions Received107
Yesterday, 12:30 pm
New
#12
Quote from nkodama
I review the paper of SO(4) symmetry but this is the theory of relativistic hydrogen atom.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0711.0049.pdf
But this does not include the V(r) potential as is =1/r at r=o potential is infinite and cause the huge error.
So electron deep orbit theory corrected this potential at r=0 by distributing positive charge uniformly inside the nucleus.
But Relativistic hydrogen atom theory does not include this potential abnormality.
so both are totally different although the terminology is similar.
So for cold fusion we must focus on electron deep orbit theory not SO(4) symmetry of RHA.
RHA theory is related to the quantum number of n,l,s, not related to the incorrect coulomb potential.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…Runge%E2%80%93Lenz_vector
Display More
SO(4) model is based on the neutron wavefunction of proton and electron, which means that neutron is to be proton and electron pair.
THis is the result of electron deep orbit theory so the results is the same because both are based on the same hypo.
SO I hope every researcher understand that SO(4) is the same of Electron deep orbit theory or small hydrogen theory.
I have a hard time believing that “this time” they “HAVE IT”. THhere have been a few too many of those “just around the corner” scientific efforts.