The NYT’s? I will take it with a giant grain of salt.
Well, it’s a magazine feature. They clearly participated in a lengthy interview and accompanying photospread with the NYTs. That’s strike #1. Strike #2 is the article was published and now, two-days later, these idiots haven’t made any allegations that they were ‘misquoted,’ probably because they weren’t.
BRCC has shot off a few of its own toes previously, so in this instance NYT adds no additional doubt. This is already a tainted brand.