Dershowitz is wrong in his pronouncement about a lack of evidence of material fraud - that is to say fraud of such a magnitude it likely altered the outcome.
He’s also wrong to dismiss the imperfection of this election because previous elections were imperfect. That’s not how civil societies should view First Principle infirmities like unreliable elections.
But, he’s correct insomuch that nothing is going to come from it no matter how compelling or irrefutable the evidence of fraud becomes. There are a lot of reasons why nothing will happen like the risk-adverse nature of the Court and the gaping holes in statutory and constitutional law surrounding electoral fraud. There simply isn’t a constitutional framework for undoing an election months after it has been certified per constitutional requirements.
The best outcome that could possibly be hoped for is that there would be a groundswell of popular support to secure future elections. But, the media and the Dems are hellbent in making sure that these allegations are dismissed as crazy ‘rightwing’ conspiracy theories...and that will likely work because the power of the media and big tech today to control narratives is enormous, far greater than what Robber Barons could have dreamed about.
Add tech and most GOPe to that list stiflin g dissent and information