So you didn’t bother to read my link, did you?
There is a whole section on RCTs. There are 30 of them in the meta-study.
Did you read the last paragraph of your link?
Vaccines and treatments are both extremely valuable and complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Elimination of COVID-19 is a race against viral evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. Denying the efficacy of any method increases the risk of COVID-19 becoming endemic; and increases mortality, morbidity, and collateral damage. We do not provide medical advice.
The withsrawal of this study which is plagiarized from popular press makes the rest of the data far more equivocal because this study was the largest. Therefore it skews the meta the most. Further, this simply confirms what many of us have seen clinically. Ivermectin is at best weak at turning this disease around. You can argue the conspiracy all you want but the study was withdrawn which means it is no kn get in the data set. The largest number taken away obliterates the data. Most of us stopped with ivermectin because it delayed proper treatment and gave a very fallse hope
The bright side is that people can now focus on the reality of how to end this. If Sick, without delay seek monoclonals. Specifically regeneron. And as per your evidence, vaccination and treatment are complementary. Both play an important role in preventing and ending the pandemic. Choosing to get vaccinated both reduces your risk of disease and virtually eliminates disease progress to critical illness.
These are the facts. This comes from a synthesis of the data you present snd all the literature. And this is the closest to reality as to what all the physicians who share the opinion who have actually treated this thing for the last 18 months see at bedside.
Her mind is made up, she doesn’t want to be confused with the facts.