What an inversion of reality.
This is not a vaccine in the legal term or medical term. I am sorry but the Webster dictionary does not determine legal or medically legal terms.
Sharing information about a non-FDA approved mRNA gene therapy does not mean you are “anti-vaccine”. This is not a vaccine in the 1905 sense.
For the record, I have had many vaccines, THAT WERE FDA APPROVED, and been in the public for decades.
I am not coming to you giving you personal medical advice.
I am posting news stories on a web site, providing facts, logic, doctors, etc... on threads YOU DO NOT HAVE TO READ....
I am exercising my 1st Amendment Right of the news site on information I am seeing that is being discussed in the public, and not coming to you pretending to be your doctor.
Now if I walked up to you and began talking to you 1 on 1, and asking about this. Then that would be a problem.
Please get off of my thread. You not intelligent enough to know the difference between reading an internet news web site where people give their opinions and personal medical advise.
Enlightened1 wrote: “Please get off of my thread. You not intelligent enough to know the difference between reading an internet news web site where people give their opinions and personal medical advise.”
First, you have no personal ownership in this or any other thread.
Second, this vaccines are in fact, vaccines despite your desire ignore medical progress and return to 1905.
Third, when you post misleading statements discouraging the vaccines you are dispensing medical advice.
Fourth, you claim a 1st Amendment right to advance your theories on the vaccines but then attempt to deny me the same right.
Fifth, you sound like a liberal practicing ‘cancel culture’.