[DugwayDuke]

dynoman wrote: “My point stands.”

Actually, no it doesn’t because here correlation is considered proof.

[dynoman]

I don’t consider correlation proof of anything but correlation.

My point stands.

Read this and get back to me with a cause; https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1391500

[dynoman]

“Based on temporal association between the use of the product and the start date of the event, a causal relationship cannot be excluded.”

https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1010989

[dynoman]

“the lung presentation is highly suggestive of diffuse alveolar damage due to COVID-19 although the patient had several negative tests for COVID.”

That is exactly what happened to a co-worker’s dad after his first vaccine. Dr said his lung cat scan looked exactly like covid but he tested negative. He had a very rough time but didn’t die.

https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1394137

[bagster]

Actually, no it doesn’t because here correlation is considered proof.

And in your fan fiction world, correlation stands for absolutely nothing.

Thought experiment: Let's say HALF of those 6k+ reported deaths (only a small fraction) were scheduled to take place without the vax.

That's still 3k+ (a small fraction) of vax caused deaths. Would you agree? And if not, is that an acceptable number of dead people to support 'the greater good'? For a vax proven not to work and to be unnecessarily administered in the first place?

When vaccines in the past have been pulled off the market for like 50 reported related deaths?

You are an inconsistent and illogical vax pimp. Enough of your propaganda. We are not retarded children to fall for your pied pipering, Fauci-bot.