There have been stolen elections before. James A. Garfield was assassinated mere months into his term, and Chester Arthur, his VP, and a corrupt party machine politician, was inaugurated and served one term. Garfield’s assassin was an office seeker who wanted patronage. Not getting it from Garfield, he hoped to do better under Arthur (OK. My source is Paul Harvey for that), but instead hung. Real genius. Arthur served one lackluster term and did not seek reelection.
JFK “won” the election of 1960 under highly suspicious circumstances. But Nixon declined to prosecute the election fraud, allowing the election to stand for the good of the nation.
If people start feeling threatened in their homes and livelihood, AND they sincerely believe the election was stolen, what you’ll have is revolution. If they don’t feel threatened in a manner that’s relevant to them, they won’t give a hoot if the election was stolen. But I think the Dems have finally done it. Ranchers on the border are in actual danger from the cartels, and the Admin is utterly feckless. The ripple effects of this, human trafficking, drug trafficking, wage slaves who work under the table at market rates, rather than the 15 an hour minimum wage that the Dems are so fond of for American citizens, is going to snowball with the election fraud as it gets proven. The cheap demagoguery that the Dems are using to fight election reform is not convincing anyone, and will probably serve to reinforce the credibility of the election fraud allegations.
That is at least what I think is going to happen. Hope I’m wrong, and vigilance committees are formed to protect the border and chase off the cartels, and Biden’s handlers realize they’re going to have to do something about the border and associated problems and they do the minimum, but the border gets shored up, and the Republicans win big in ‘22 and Trump gets back in the WH in 2024. But I don’t think I’m wrong. Dem stupidity might just make revolution inevitable.
Guiteau, the assassin, was unstable and delusional.