No logic again, because Trump wasn’t right nor effective against NSII. It wasn’t Trump’s business either.
The American LNG was uncompetitive on price and scarce for European market and it stills is nowadays.
Biden banned Canadian pipelines is bad for the American energy consumers but it is definitely not bad for the American frackers.
As for the American LNG it was coming to China since the very beginning. What should I prove when it is a common knowledge?
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org › lo...
Web results
Long-term US-China liquefied natural gas trade will bring strategic benefits to both countries.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/energysource/long-term-us-china-liquefied-natural-gas-trade-will-bring-strategic-benefits-to-both-countries/&ved=2ahUKEwiO5eqd4uHxAhUolYsKHSNyDKAQFnoECAMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1Tw76TCJtKcPwxjacHnzGa&cshid=1626238437742
It was true under Trump and remains this way under Biden.
The reason is that the profit might be generated in China but not in Europe, unless the established European sources are dusrupted and price goes up significantly. And yet, no capacity in US even to meet domestic demand,let alone European, where natural gas is the prime energy source.
Hence you have destabilization of Ukraine, which is the energy hub between Europe and Russia, and an organized effort of all the European consumers to secure direct undersea pipelines with Russia.
That you are advocating is against Europe and for China, which would like to see the European economy undermined by scarce and expensive energy.