Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fireman15

Bill Cosby is scum, but that is not the issue. He hadn’t agreement with the state to testify in civil trials if the State agreed to not bring a criminal case against him.

That is not a technicality. It’s a violation of his Constitutional rights. Blame the previous Prosecutor for making the agreement, and the new Prosecutor going ahead with a prosecution.

Sure, Cosby is guilty, but that is not the point.

As scummy as he is, he should win his case against the State. I predict the State will settle before the case goes to trial.


83 posted on 07/11/2021 11:56:53 AM PDT by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: WASCWatch
That is not a technicality. It's a violation of his Constitutional rights. Blame the previous Prosecutor for making the agreement, and the new Prosecutor going ahead with a prosecution.

You need to do a little home work. There was no formal written "agreement"... there were no negotiations... there was a press release by a prosecutor who decided not to pursue a case because it appeared weak. Another prosecutor decided that it was worth pursuing. That is about the extent of the situation. Just because one prosecutor decides not to pursue a case does not give anyone any where immunity from prosecution. That is ridiculous.

If Cosby was not a member of a protected class the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would have laughed their butts off at this "challenge". The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is a partisan body with five Democrats and one Republican. This decision was a travesty.

99 posted on 07/11/2021 10:52:59 PM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson