If it turns out there are significant side effects, what will be the employer’s liability. I’ll bet the corporate attorney advised against this.
>>> If it turns out there are significant side effects, what will be the employer’s liability.
Seems i remember reading at least a couple of weeks ago where a judge actually ruled that employers WERE liable if employees took the shot under mandate and had problems with it.
So yeah... employees who are facing mandates by their employers should actively remind their employers that UNLIKE the manufacturers or the government, THEY ARE LIABLE for any complications if they force employees to take it.