If true you would expect the distribution of the potentially disqualified votes to match the overall election result.
The problem with this type of issue is you can never go back and find out who the disqualified votes were for, so you can’t say with any certainty it would have changed the outcome.
“The problem with this type of issue is you can never go back and find out who the disqualified votes were for, so you can’t say with any certainty it would have changed the outcome.”
A full forensic audit would reveal far more than that.
Biden did not even kind of win GA...
You can’t say for certain who voted for whom, that is true.
But
The legal standard has always been that more unlawful ballots were cast than the margin of victory. You never had to prove who they voted for - that is obviously an impossible standard. In the past, once you could prove that more unlawful ballots were cast than the margin of victory, courts would throw out the result and order another election.
In my district in NC just 2 years ago, a campaign worker for the Republican candidate was found to have ballot harvested. Even though the number of ballots harvested was smaller than the margin of victory, the court threw out the election result and Mark Harris was unseated. We had no congressional representation for a year until a special election could be held. In that special election Republican Dan Bishop won. So courts throwing out election results and ordering a special election is not some rare or esoteric thing. Its been pretty standard once the legal standard was met - except for 2020.......