I don't disagree, however are you openly advocating censoring and squelching them out of the national dialogue using such brute force censorship and propaganda which is exactly what's happening here?
Do you not see the media/social media reveling in their power to eliminate from the national discourse opinions that they disagree with?
I'm no Q-Tard. I have a friend who is one and I do my best consistently trying to convince her otherwise using facts, logic and reason hoping one day she'll get it that "Q" is nothing more than a shyster profiting from people like her.
I would *never* advocate censoring her opinions out of public discourse as the media/"social media" are doing today.
The answer to free speech we disagree with is always more free speech in opposition and not a flat-out censoring (read that: removal) from public discourse.
I'm somewhat flabbergasted that I'm sitting here this morning with only one cup of coffee in me and defending "Q" and his/their followers right to express their opinions publicly.
Something is really wrong when I feel I have to defend those I oppose. (God help me for hitting the post button on this ...)
Maybe you can provide evidence that 'Q' profited in ANY way from their 'Q' posts?
(not talking about the several PAYTRIOTS who did)
Something is really wrong when I feel I have to defend those I oppose. (God help me for hitting the post button on this ...)
Why in the world would you OPPOSE the strongest of patriots whose goal is to expose and take down our enemies.
Your priorities are all goofed up. Get more coffee in ya.
** “Q” is nothing more than a shyster profiting from people like her. **
what’s the profit?
+1
Well enough said.