Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

It wasn’t mandatory. It was an option. Frankly my gripe is when defense and prosecution has an agreement on sentencing, the judge should be in on it and part of it before the defendant agrees to it. But this guy was given a choice. And the more harsh really wasn’t all that bad.


25 posted on 07/09/2021 9:39:01 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: joesbucks
It was an unfair option. It shouldn't have been given at all.

One cannot just wave away an unconstitutional option as being given an option.

-PJ

26 posted on 07/09/2021 9:49:32 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

there is no nexus or connection between the two it is bad law the law is an ass


28 posted on 07/09/2021 2:18:34 PM PDT by rolling_stone (usa nice experiment ruined by "progressives'" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson