“The defendant had a choice.” - 5 years probation or 1 year probation plus vaxx
How does that make any sense logically or legally?
Nothing about how this vaccine has been handled by public officials makes any sense, unless seen from a 1984 perspective. This whole thing is trending in the direction that a similar “choice” is coming for us too: FEMA camps or Vaccine
Again, he had a choice. If it doesn’t make sense, then take the longer probation. I think his main peeve is he had a deal worked out that the judge chose not to accept. Which is the judges prerogative. Now if the judges only sentence was a shot then I see the issue.