Replies

All of this is interesting, but I want to see the mRNA amped up and sequenced, and run against laboratories of genes, to see what that is coding for.

This comes up time and again and is the center of dispute. People tell me that the mRNA has been sequenced, always, all over the world, all over the United States, everyone has sequenced it.

Then I point out that this cannot be true because NO ONE is using it. China released the genome on Jan 10 and Moderna engineer was featured in an article saying he saw that China released it and 'got right to work' because he had 'everything he needed' to get started.

I pointed out, "Hey, why was the Moderna engineer, and everyone else, WAITING FOR CHINA to release the genome if 'everyone sequenced it everywhere, everyday." Why would we let China give us the genome if we had the capacity to get it ourselves?

Also, China used gene sequencing technology which is not appropriate for 'novel' coronaviruses because it would patch into missing pieces of the genome portions from other, similar coronaviruses. But if Covid is 'novel' there aren't similar viruses to pull from.

When China released that genome, which has to be inaccurate, it said at the time it did not reference the isolated live virus because it didn't have it?

But then China didn't use that sequenced genome it released to make its own vaccinse - instead China used isolated live virus.

Around that time, the fake PCR test was created. It did not use live virus to identify a sequence. Instead, China's genome, which has to be fake, was used to create the fake PCR test.

Bought-paid-for-by-NIH or Bill Gates researchers were claiming they had isolated samples and publishing research at the same time independent researchers have been told by the CDC and virus supply houses that isolated samples are 'unavailable'. So if you weren't on the 'inside' with Fauci or Bill Gates, your request for an isolated sample is denied because it's 'not available.'

None of this makes sense. Someone's lying. A FReeper called a supply house for an isolated sample and was told it was 'unavailable'. But on FR I'm told everyone has sequenced it and the isolated sample is available everywhere and is in use - it's just no one ever used the isolated sample to create the genome, the PCR test or the vaccines.

The vaccine manufactureres say in their FDA filings that they did not use the live virus to build their vaccines. Also, their 'vaccine' trials were run using the invalid PCR test to validate their results (efficacy). The PCR was so inaccurate that Pfizer declared a few thousand sick people as 'suspected Covid' because the PCR said they didn't have Covid but the patients presented with Covid symptoms. Oh, if only someone had a TEST for the virus, am I right?

Is there just one mRNA sequence? Somebody claiming to be an engineer on a COVID vaccine claimed there were four different genes added together, including reverse transcriptase which would amplify the effects of the other three, and make their expression more permanent.

I believe that the CDC patented Covid (SARS2) just like they privately patented SARS1. This means they can control who studies it, measures it, and tests for it. This would explain why no one has come up with an accurate test - the CDC doesn't give permission. It explains why the virus supply houses say the isolate is not available. It is illegal to patent a natural virus and it's a violation of weapons and arms treaties to patent a manmade virus - but a patent would explain why the only information we get is through NIH/Bill Gates funded research hubs and independent researchers can't answer our questions.

I have read that Covid-19 had RT and the capacity to imprint onto DNA. But that was from a biased source. I've read the 'vaccines' are expected to have a slice of HIV and RT to go with it, and maybe they can blame reverse transcription on Covid to deflect from its presence in the 'vaccines.

No independent third party is sequencing these vaccines to see if what they say is in them is in them. It is like FDA letting a company turn out a medicine with no purity standard, or ability to check it.

Yes. That's why I think it's patented. IN 1992, legislation was passed that changed the mission of the FDA from that of 3rd party evaluator (pharma submits samples for testing) to make the FDA collaborators with pharma (Now pharma gets to test it's own products and lie about it, the FDA covers them).

So no indempendent third party is sequencing or testing etc. Yes the FDA helps companies turn out medicines without valid data and doesn't check it. The corruption runs deep. The CDC was corrupted at the same time - 1992 the CDC created a foundation to accept donations. Bill Gates became the CDC's biggest donor but George Soros, Pfizer, and many other pharma companies and competing interests drive the CDC via funding through the foundation.

The NIH was captured a long time ago - it routinely partners with the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation on projects of mutual interest. Really, Bill Gates weilds the CDC and NIH through donations and the American public mistakenly believe these are independent agencies.

Bill Gates is treated like a deity at the World Health Organization. He's been busy collecting people and agencies. Funding for research and universities from Gates, CDC, NIH etc. and extensive collaborations means none of those institutions will risk funding by disagreeing or speaking out. The HYDRA of depopulation's hero, Bill Gates, is extensive and controls funding and information. Anyone crosses the line and they are stripped of credibility from the captured medical community.

So you may point out, as others have, that it hasn't been isolated or sequenced and then you'll get angry posts with links to NIH or GATES funded research. Often the research is through a college and then I look up the college and they partnered with the NIH, CDC, Gates or all three. Same with journals.