To: Bill of Rights FIRST
Structural steel is slightly stronger than it needs to be, to carry the expected load with a safety margin.
When one support piling collapses, it’s load is transferred to its neighbors. They are then overloaded and collapse, and so on.
Do you also claim that fire can’t melt steel?
Did the WTC also collapse due to explosives?
53 posted on
07/04/2021 5:22:02 PM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: DuncanWaring
Structural steel does not collapse without explosives without any left standing.
54 posted on
07/04/2021 7:31:46 PM PDT by
Bill of Rights FIRST
(If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
To: DuncanWaring
About your last question, ask the experts:
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
55 posted on
07/04/2021 7:35:24 PM PDT by
Bill of Rights FIRST
(If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
To: DuncanWaring
Then there should be standing and partially standing beams if no explosives were used.
58 posted on
07/04/2021 7:45:07 PM PDT by
Bill of Rights FIRST
(If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson